Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0013/PC RESO 879 VISTA DR <br />REV: 03-05-24 VR <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />D. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will conflict <br />with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate <br />public easements will be provided. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision would not conflict with any essential public <br />access/ use of easements on the property. There is a 10’ wide stormdrain <br />and sewer easement at the rear of the property which will be retained and <br />would not be effected by the proposed subdivision. <br /> <br />E. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the <br />public interest as the Subdivision Committee may determine. <br /> <br />The project does not conflict with written public policy or the public interest. <br /> <br />Section 5. The Planning Commission may grant one or more exceptions if it <br />makes all of the following findings as outlined in Section 30.69 of the Redwood City <br />Municipal Code. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that: <br /> <br />A. The property is of such shape or size, or is affected by such <br />topographical conditions, or is subject to such title limitations of <br />record that it is impossible or impracticable for the subdivider to <br />comply with the requirement with which exception is taken. <br /> <br />The shape and size of the property makes it impractical for the subdivision <br />to comply with the lot depth threshold pursuant to Section 30.117(B). <br />Meeting the requirement would result in the creation of non-conforming lots <br />and potentially inaccessible portions of the subdivision. As such, an <br />exception to the requirement is necessary. <br /> <br />B. The exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the subdivider. <br /> <br />Granting the exception to the lot depth threshold is necessary for the <br />subdivider to create developable lots which are otherwise consistent with <br />the Zoning Ordinance requirements for the R-1-7 Zoning District. <br /> <br />C. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public <br />welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity of the subject <br />property. <br /> <br />The exception will not be injurious to other properties as it is consistent with <br />the general character of lots in the vicinity of the subject property. The <br />granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare as <br />there is currently no development or site improvements proposed. Future