My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso24 16255
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Reso24 16255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 2:35:50 PM
Creation date
10/29/2024 2:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
10/28/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0071/CC RESO 1900 BROADWAY (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) <br />REV: 10-23-24 VR <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />to Sections 15168 and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, found no further environmental <br />review is required for the Project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, after the public hearing, the City Council considered the whole of the <br />Record for the Project and determined that the General Plan Amendments appropriately <br />implement the General Plan and DTPP goals and development standards (as amended) <br />and applicable provisions of the Redwood City Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby <br />incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. <br /> <br />Section 2. The City Council, having independently heard, considered, and <br />weighed all the facts and evidence in the Record, finds that the above recitals are <br />accurate and constitute findings in this matter and, together with the Project Record, have <br />served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set <br />forth in this resolution. <br /> <br />Section 3. CEQA. In the exercise of its independent judgement, based on the facts <br />and evidence in the Record, the City Council concurrently adopted a Resolution finding <br />that, pursuant to the CEQA Consistency Checklist, the Project is exempt from further <br />environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15183, and does not require further environmental review under <br />CEQA. <br /> <br />Section 4. General Plan Amendment Findings. Based on the facts and evidence <br />in the Record, the City Council, in the exercise of its independent judgment, finds: <br /> <br />a. The Project General Plan Mixed-Use Downtown Amendments to increase the <br />DTPP Maximum Allowable Development office cap are consistent with the goals <br />and policies of the General Plan (as amended) including but not limited to the <br />General Plan goals, policies and programs listed in the Staff Report prepared for <br />the Project: BE-1.4, BE–11.6, BE-18.2, BE-18.5, BE-18.7, BE-18.8, BE-23.7, BE- <br />25, BE-26, BE-29, BE-30, BE-31 and H-2.3. The Mixed-Use Downtown <br />Amendments appropriately implement the General Plan’s vision for the Mixed <br />Use–Downtown land use designation as the approved DTPP Plan Wide <br />Amendments allow increases to the office development cap. <br /> <br />b. The Project General Plan Mixed-Use Downtown Amendments are limited to <br />an increase in the allowed office development cap and will not create conditions <br />that would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. These <br />amendments would instead enhance the DTPP area by promoting planned, transit- <br />oriented development, including increased office development, active retail space, <br />and an open space plaza consistent with General Plan goals and policies. The
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.