Reso24 16252 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

120 Prior EIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off-Site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? DTPP EIR DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR Focused GPU EIR XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or Not Addressed LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Not Addressed LTS with Mitigation LTS with Mitigation No No No No Documentation: 1900 Broadway Component: a. i) The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments SEIR found that implementation of the DTPP Amendments would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation (MM CR-3) in conjunction with compliance with the regulatory framework. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 7-23 through 7-25) included explanation of changes in State law since certification of the 2010 DTPP program EIR that require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes regarding tribal cultural resources. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (p. 24) described the City’s tribal outreach/notification process (letters sent to eight Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission) and the results (no responses received). In addition, the results of a Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File search for the DTPP SEIR did not identify sacred lands within the DTPP area. MM CR-3 and compliance with the regulatory framework would reduce any significant impacts to any unidentified resources that may be inadvertently discovered. Because no tribal cultural resources were identified, the project component would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource; no impact would occur, and no mitigation would be required. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated that what was analyzed in the EIR/SEIR, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. ii) The DTPP program EIR included Mitigation Measure 7-1, requiring all project work to be stopped in the event any deposits of prehistoric or historic archaeological materials are encountered during project construction activities, with additional follow-up measures required for assessment of the resource and recommendations for avoidance, in- place preservation, and/or recovery of the resource. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 7-21 through 7-23) concurred with the DTPP EIR conclusion and includes Mitigation Measure CR-3, which restates Mitigation Measure 7-1 from the DTPP Final EIR with minor text revisions (“clarifying amendments”). In addition, the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR added the following requirement (p. 7-21): “The CRMP [Cultural ATTY/RESO.0074/CC RESO 847 WOODSIDE (CEQA) - EXHIBIT 1 - CEQA CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST REV: 10-23-24 VR Page 120 of 135