Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/15/24 (P:\M-S\RWC2101.04 Docktown CE\PRODUCTS\Docktown_CEMemo_20241115.docx) 12 <br />According to the BAAQMD, regional air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is <br />sufficient in size to independently create regional nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. <br />Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to cumulatively significant adverse air quality <br />impacts. Therefore, if the proposed project’s daily average or annual emissions of construction- or <br />operational-period criteria air pollutants exceed any applicable threshold established by the <br />BAAQMD, the proposed project would result in a considerable contribution to a cumulatively <br />significant impact. As shown in Table B, in the following section, implementation of the proposed <br />project would not generate significant construction-period emissions. Additionally, the proposed <br />project would not result in a significant increase in the generation of vehicle trips or vehicle miles <br />traveled that would increase air pollutant emissions as there is no construction or other operational <br />phase of the project proposed after the deconstruction work. <br />As noted above, the proposed project would generate temporary and short-term increases in noise <br />from construction activities. However, the proposed project and any other project in the <br />surrounding area would be required to conform to the City’s construction noise standards, which <br />would ensure the project’s construction activities would not be considered a cumulatively <br />considerable contribution to the total noise environment in the project vicinity. A significant <br />cumulative impact would also occur if implementation of the proposed project would result in any <br />permanent increase of 3 dBA or more in traffic noise levels. As described below, the proposed <br />project would not result in a significant increase in the generation of vehicle trips or vehicle miles <br />traveled that would increase air pollutant emissions as there is no construction or other operational <br />phase of the project proposed after the deconstruction work. Therefore, the proposed project <br />would not result in any permanent off-site cumulative traffic noise impacts. <br />As described above, the proposed project does not include construction or any other operational <br />phase of the project proposed following the completion of deconstruction work. Therefore, <br />potential impacts would be limited to the deconstruction phase. As described below, the proposed <br />deconstruction activities and methods would ensure potential impacts to fish, foraging waterbirds, <br />and harbor seals would be less than significant. In addition, Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3 <br />from the EIR prepared for the 1548 Maple Street Project include measures to avoid the degradation <br />of aquatic habitat by maintaining water quality and controlling erosion and sedimentation during <br />construction. These measures include, but are not limited to, installation of silt fencing and erosion <br />control wattles between Redwood Creek and construction activities. Therefore, the proposed <br />project’s deconstruction activities and methods combined with the mitigation measures required for <br />the 1548 Maple Street project would ensure that there would be no cumulatively considerable <br />impacts related to biological resources. <br />As a result of Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised <br />CEQA Guidelines for use on December 28, 2018, to include removal of vehicle delay and level of <br />service (LOS) from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts <br />are to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on VMT. Simultaneous with adoption of CEQA rule <br />changes, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) published the Technical Advisory on <br />Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory). The Technical Advisory includes a <br />discussion of the use of screening thresholds to identify when a project should be expected to cause <br />a less than significant impact without conducting a detailed study. One of the recommendations is <br />6.G. - Page 16 of 45 <br />194