Laserfiche WebLink
A SMALLER PROJECT COULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE MANY IMPACTS <br />This is a fragile site on a subsiding, capped and unlined dump, surrounded on three sides by the <br />rich ecosystems of a wildlife refuge, and on the fourth side by existing residential <br />neighborhoods. Further reduction of the project’s overall size could have the following beneficial <br />effects. <br />● Reducing destructive penetrations of the landfill cap and the landfill from pile driving and <br />limiting potential migration of toxics into the adjacent refuge habitat <br />● Reducing the need for 7 to 14 feet of weight of added fill on the fragile landfill cap, by <br />reducing below-grade parking <br />● Reducing the number of tall buildings, which would allow these to be set back farther <br />from the shoreline, minimizing shadows on the refuge and night lighting that disturbs <br />night-foraging wildlife <br />● Reducing nuisance of construction noise and dust for residential neighbors <br />● Increasing potential for a wider shoreline buffer zone for sea level rise resilience <br />flexibility over the next 75 years <br />● Reducing the number of employees, which would help reduce traffic impacts on local <br />roads <br />● Reducing the number of parking spaces required, which in turn would result in fewer or <br />smaller parking structures <br />● Reducing the number of development phases, and potentially shortening the overall <br />25-year construction timeline. <br />SHORTENING THE 25-YEAR PHASED BUILDOUT COULD REDUCE THE NEED FOR <br />EXPENSIVE INTERIM FLOOD PROTECTION MEASURES WHILE ALSO REDUCING <br />CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS. <br />In the 75-year life of the proposed development, given a 25-year planning window plus the <br />50-year average building life, the sea level is projected to rise by 3 feet or more, according to <br />the official estimates of the California Ocean Protection Council.8 Delaying full buildout until <br />2050 dramatically increases the risk that the site could face inundation and the buildings <br />become stranded liabilities for the City before the end of their useful life. Protecting these <br />buildings through the end of the century will likely require significant, ongoing taxpayer <br />investment in additional defensive measures. <br />A DETAILED ANALYSIS AND UPDATED SURVEY OF THE LANDFILL IS ESSENTIAL. <br />The proposed development is located on a deteriorating former dump site adjacent to the <br />sensitive Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment done <br />in 2018 by Ramboll US Corporation found that <br /> “The historical use of the site as a landfill, coupled with the existing groundwater and <br />leachate contamination, methane and other potential vapor intrusion concerns, and <br />the continued subsidence issues resulting in necessary upgrades to the LFG <br />8 California Ocean Protection Council State of California Sea Level Rise Guidance: 2024 <br />sierraclub.org/loma-prieta ~ 3921 East Bayshore Road, Suite 204, Palo Alto, CA 94303 <br /> 5