Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0029/CC RESO APPROVING ARCHITECTUAL PERMIT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (920 SHASTA) – EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 04-22-25 VR <br />Page 20 of 22 <br />is reviewed and approved by the City Planning Department, and any appropriate <br />treatment completed, project construction activity within the area of the find may <br />resume. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the Project <br />Permittee(s) shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further <br />disturbance. If the project Applicant(s) does not accept the MLD’s recommendations, the <br />Permittee(s) or the MLD may request mediation by the NAHC. [Public Resources Code <br />Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5] [COA][PLANNING] <br />General Requirements <br />86. Modifications – Permit modifications that include changing the use, altering any structure <br />or modifying improvements shall be reviewed by the final review authority of the originally <br />approved permit, unless the Community Development Director determines that the change <br />is minor, and requires approval by the Zoning Administrator. [COA][PLANNING] <br />87. Failure to Comply with Conditions Of Approval. If the Applicant constructs buildings or <br />makes improvements in accordance with these approvals, but fails to comply with any of <br />the Conditions of Approval or limitations set forth in these Conditions of Approval and does <br />not cure any such failure within a reasonable time after notice from the City, then such <br />failure shall be cause for non-issuance of a certificate of occupancy, revocation or <br />modification of these approvals or any other remedies available to the City. <br />[COA][PLANNING] <br />88. Indemnification – Per Redwood City Code Section 1.54, the Applicant shall indemnify, <br />defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all <br />claims and lawsuits from third party(s) involving or related to the City’s consideration <br />and/or approval of the Project. In doing so, Applicant shall defend (with counsel approved <br />by City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from <br />and against any claim, action, or proceeding (including without limitation any appeal or <br />petition for review thereof) against the City or its agents, officers or employees related to <br />an approval of the Project, including without limitation any related application, permit, <br />certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, compliance or <br />failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, and/or processing methods <br />(“Challenge”). City may (but is not obligated to) defend such Challenge as City, in its sole <br />discretion, determines appropriate, all at Applicant’s sole cost and expense. Applicant shall <br />bear any and all losses, damages, injuries, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including, without <br />limitation, staff time and in-house attorney's fees on a fully-loaded basis, attorney’s fees <br />for outside legal counsel, expert witness fees, court costs, and other litigation expenses) <br />arising out of or related to any Challenge (“Costs”), whether incurred by Applicant, City, or <br />awarded to any third party, and shall pay to the City upon demand any Costs incurred by <br />the City. No modification of the Project, any application, permit, certification, condition, <br />environmental determination, other approval, change in applicable laws and regulations, <br />or change in processing methods shall alter the Applicant’s indemnity obligation. Per <br />Government Code Section 66474.9, Applicant’s indemnification obligation with respect to