|
<br />
<br />
<br />138
<br />The Preliminary Engineering Study prepared for the Commercial Component by BKF (December 14, 2024) evaluated
<br />the preliminary utility, grading and stormwater design of the Commercial Component and found that the site is capable
<br />of supporting the Commercial component and concluded (p. 8): “It is our determination that based on the information
<br />available at this time, the existing public infrastructure [except recycled water infrastructure] is adequate to serve the
<br />proposed development. The site can be readily served by all required utilities and public services and will have a less
<br />than significant impact on the existing sanitary sewer, domestic water, and storm drain systems.” The proposed
<br />Commercial Component would implement DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR Mitigation Measures UT-
<br />1b, “Water System Upgrades”, UT-1c, “Sanitary Sewer Upgrades”, and UT-1d, “Stormwater System Upgrades”
<br />through the payment of fair share contribution fees, as required by the City, project design features (i.e. water system
<br />upgrades, sanitary sewer system upgrades, stormwater system upgrades described in the Preliminary Engineering
<br />Report, subject to review and approval by the City Public Works Department), and system capacity-enhancing
<br />improvements funded and/or constructed by the private developers. As part of the realignment and alteration of Arroyo
<br />Ojo, a new pipe would convey stormwater runoff from the new creek outlet into the existing storm drain system in
<br />accordance with Mitigation Measure UT-1d; flooding impacts are discussed in more detail Section X. Hydrology and
<br />Water Quality under c.
<br />The study (p. 2) notes that there is no existing recycled water infrastructure to serve the proposed development;
<br />however the Commercial Component would install a new recycled water main from the nearest point of connection
<br />to the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Marshall Street, along Marshall Street, Broadway, California Street, and
<br />through the entire site frontage to the intersection of new Franklin Street and James Avenue to hook-up to the City’s
<br />recycled water system prior to building occupancy, in accordance to Mitigation Measure UT-2, “Recycled Water
<br />Infrastructure” (see discussion under b. below).
<br />Regarding fire flow, the DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-9 and 10-10) concluded that impacts resulting from DTPP-
<br />facilitated development on the water distribution system and on fire flow would be less than significant (see item XV,
<br />Public Services, of this checklist regarding fire flow requirements). The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program
<br />SEIR (p. 10-35) concluded that impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure
<br />UT-1a. The Preliminary Engineering Study provided fire flow calculations for the Commercial Component based on
<br />a review of the California Fire Code (2019) (BKF, p. 2). The 901 El Camino Real commercial building has a required
<br />fire flow of 4,336 gallons per minute (gpm) as determined by the square footage of the three largest successive floors
<br />of the building. Fire flow test information provided by the City of Redwood City indicates that the fire flow available
<br />from the City’s domestic water system is 2,750 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The Preliminary Engineering Study
<br />assumed there would be a 50 percent reduction in rate of flow for fire sprinklers per California Fire Code standards
<br />which allows for the required fire flow for a building with an automatic sprinkler system to be reduced. For this reason,
<br />the required fire flow for the proposed commercial building would be 2,168 gpm. Because the fire flow of the City’s
<br />domestic water system (2,750 gpm) exceeds the required fire flow for the proposed commercial building (assuming a
<br />50 percent flow reduction for fire sprinklers), the Preliminary Engineering Report determined adequate flow and
<br />pressure are available to meet Commercial Component fire flows. Additionally, the Commercial Component would
<br />be subject to Mitigation Measure UT-1a, “Emergency Water Storage”, which requires the Commercial Component to
<br />pay a fair-share contribution towards the cost of providing emergency water storage.
<br /> Therefore, for the reasons above, the Commercial Component would, therefore, not generate new or more severe
<br />impacts related to the relocation or construction of new or expanded utilities facilities beyond those analyzed in the
<br />DTPP program EIR and the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR, and there is no new information of
<br />substantial importance for CEQA purposes.
<br />b. The DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-8 and 10-9) concluded that development facilitated by the DTPP would have no
<br />impact on water supply. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 10-31 through 10-36) concurred with
<br />the DTPP conclusion with respect to DTPP development but added additional analysis pertaining to growth anticipated
<br />with the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments. Because the Plan-Wide Amendments impact was potentially significant, the
<br />SEIR included a new mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure UT-2, “Recycled Water Infrastructure”). Mitigation
<br />Measure UT-2 requires use of recycled water via recycled water supply pipeline extensions for all subsequent
<br />development projects in the amended DTPP area, as needed, to ensure sufficient recycled water capacity for recycled
<br />water demands of projects. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR analysis also included a description
<br />of the current (2020) Urban Water Management Plan for the City, and explained that (1) the City has a contract with
<br />the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) for the provision of an annual supply of 12,243 acre-feet of
<br />water through the year 2034; (2) the UWMP was prepared to be consistent with the City’s development projections,
<br />including the future population, employment, and water demand projections for buildout of the City’s 2010 General
<br />Plan; and (3) the UWMP incorporated the water demands associated with subsequent other proposed development
<br />ATTY/RESO.0031/CC RESO CEQA GUIDELINES (901 EL CAMINO REAL)
<br />REV: 04-22-25 VR
<br />
<br />Page 138 of 148
|