Reso25 16298 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

145 Prior EIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off-Site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? DTPP EIR DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR Focused GPU EIR XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Not Addressed LTS LTS No No No No b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Not Addressed LTS LTS No No No No c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Not Addressed LTS LTS No No No No d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact No Impact No Impact No No No No Documentation: Commercial Component: a. The DTPP Final EIR did not analyze the impacts on the DTPP as it relates to wildland fire as that was not a part of the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G at the time. THE DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments SEIR found impacts related to wildfire to be less than significant. As discussed above in item VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the project component would not impair or interfere with emergency access or impair emergency response and evacuation in the Precise Plan area (also see item XV, Public Services). Thus, this impact is less than significant. The Commercial Component would not generate new or more severe impacts beyond those analyzed in the SEIR, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. b. and c. The DTPP Final EIR did not analyze the impacts on the DTPP as it relates to wildland fire. THE DTPP Plan- Wide Amendments SEIR found impacts related to wildfire to be less than significant. The DTPP area is not in a Very High Fire Severity Hazard Zone or a State Responsibility Area, and there are no high fire hazard areas or wildlands susceptible to wildfire in the project vicinity. No wildfire-related infrastructure would be necessary. Impacts related to wildfire or installation and/or maintenance of wildfire-related infrastructure would be less than significant (DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR p. 18-830). The proposed Commercial Component would not generate new or more severe impacts beyond those analyzed in the SEIR, and there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. d. The DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-25 through 10-27) determined that no impacts associated with the Commercial Component would occur related to flooding, seiche, tsunami, and mudflow/debris flow, and no mitigation is required. The DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR (pp. 10-3 and 10-42) concurred with the DTPP EIR conclusion. The proposed Commercial Component would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. The Commercial Component would not generate new or more severe impacts beyond those analyzed in the SEIR, there is no new information of substantial importance for CEQA purposes. 30As noted in the DTPP Plan-Wide Amendments program SEIR, at the time the DTPP EIR was prepared, Wildfire was not a topic included in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. ATTY/RESO.0031/CC RESO CEQA GUIDELINES (901 EL CAMINO REAL) REV: 04-22-25 VR Page 145 of 148