My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2025.04.28 Speaker Card - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2025.04.28 Speaker Card - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2025 4:12:20 PM
Creation date
5/1/2025 4:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
4/28/2025
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Modified:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Text:
mailto:jimgernand@sbcglobal.net
ID:
2
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Modified:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Text:
mailto:publiccomment@redwoodcity.org
ID:
3
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Modified:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Text:
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
ID:
4
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Modified:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Text:
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smdailyjournal.com%2Fnews%2Flocal%2F7-story-biotech-plan-in-the-works-in-south-san-francisco%2Farticle_e2cd7d8e-ebe4-11ee-aabd-63af479416de.html&data=05%7C02%7Cpubliccomment%40redwoodcity.org%7C8e24d8128be94345f0a208dd86af0e78%7C02eee40d6a354d7588035403096cc23e%7C0%7C0%7C638814808619322855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GJZ1hvPMYA3AfmbTIvDiZC7qcOOTDy232pqVMiYyx5I%3D&reserved=0
ID:
5
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Modified:
5/1/2025 4:12 PM
Text:
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smdailyjournal.com%2Fnews%2Flocal%2F7-story-biotech-plan-in-the-works-in-south-san-francisco%2Farticle_e2cd7d8e-ebe4-11ee-aabd-63af479416de.html&data=05%7C02%7Cpubliccomment%40redwoodcity.org%7C8e24d8128be94345f0a208dd86af0e78%7C02eee40d6a354d7588035403096cc23e%7C0%7C0%7C638814808619322855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GJZ1hvPMYA3AfmbTIvDiZC7qcOOTDy232pqVMiYyx5I%3D&reserved=0
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From:Jim Gernand <br />To:publiccomment <br />Subject:City Council Meeting Agenda Item 7.B 901 El Camino Real <br />Date:Monday, April 28, 2025 4:47:42 PM <br />You don't often get email from jimgernand@sbcglobal.net. Learn why this is important <br />Dear Council Members, <br />I am sending these comments regarding tonight's agenda item 7.B 901 El Camino <br />project. <br />I have concerns about the overall impact of a development of this scale at this <br />location, traffic (even though it is near rail and bus service, there will be over 500 <br />parking spaces, so we can expect at least that many vehicle trips to be generated), <br />hazardous materials associated with labs for example. <br />But the main purpose of my writing is to express my opinion that the community <br />benefits package overstates the value of what the proposal lists in the Staff Report, <br />and even if the value is $9.9 million dollars, this amoiunt is way less in total than <br />similar projects in other nearby cities. As an example, the 300,000 SF Vigilant <br />Holdings project in South San Francisco is contributing $16 million in addition to <br />planning and permit fees. <br />Reference The Daily Journal Story dated 3/27/2024 <br />https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/7-story-biotech-plan-in-the-works-in- <br />south-san-francisco/article_e2cd7d8e-ebe4-11ee-aabd-63af479416de.html <br />In the case of the 901 El Camino Project, <br />Two major items stand out: Street Relocation valued at $4 million is almost half of the <br />benefit. My understanding is that the relocation is vastly more to the benefit of the <br />developer, so I fail to see why the cost of shifting the street is counted towards <br />community benefit. <br />Also, the 6,500 SF teen center is valued at $2.4 million - that is $370 per SF. Seems <br />a high value for limited access to a space the businesses in the building will be using <br />during the day, as community use is only after hours. Valueing a partime space at <br />$370 per sf is excessive. <br />I ask that the Community Benifits negotioan should exclude the cost of the Franklin <br />Street, use a more reasonable value for the teen center, and should total at least <br />$16,000,000 like S. Sand Francisco is getting for a similar project (by the way, the <br />SSF project only has 450 parking spaces. <br />Thnak you for your consideration of my comments. <br />Regards,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.