My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2025.06.09 Speaker Card - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2025.06.09 Speaker Card - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2025 4:57:00 PM
Creation date
6/10/2025 4:56:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/9/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cancer <br />Wolf and Wolf (2004) demonstrated a significant increase in cancer rates for people <br />living within about 1,000 to 1,600 feet of a cell tower. Wolf and Wolf (2004) showed <br />there were 4 times more cases of cancer in the antenna base station area than in the other <br />areas if people lived within about 350 meters (1148 feet) of the cell tower for 3 to 7 <br />years. Eger (2004) looked at cancer rates in Germany and cell tower proximity. The <br />authors found that after 5 years, the cancer incidence within the 400-m [1312 ft] radius <br />doubled compared to the group living further away. After 10 years, the cancer <br />incidence within the 400-m [1312 ft] radius tripled. <br />Khurana (2010) looked at several epidemiologic studies and concluded as well that <br />cancer risk rises near cell towers. <br />Gandhi (2015) found genetic Damage in those living within 300 meters (1000 feet) of <br />cell towers with higher power. Gandhi concluded, “analysis further revealed daily mobile <br />phone usage, location of residence and power density as significant predictors of genetic <br />damage… which…may lead to cancer.” <br />Gulati (2024) found a statistically significant nearly two-fold elevated rate of some <br />chromosomal aberrations in the group with higher exposure within 240 feet. These <br />findings were shown with emissions all within current FCC limits <br /> <br />Lopez (2021) did a longitudinal study examining the background radiation level and <br />health effects of those living near cell antenna base stations in a Madrid neighborhood <br />both before and after cell tower placement. They noted after cell tower deployment a <br />cancer rate 10 times higher than the general population of Spain. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Neurobehavioral Symptoms- Electromagnetic Syndrome <br /> <br />Khurana et al (2010) reviewed 10 studies of cell tower health effects and found that in 8 <br />of the studies those who lived closest to cellular antennas had higher rates of the <br />following ailments: fatigue, disturbed sleep, headaches, nausea, a feeling of discomfort, <br />difficulty concentrating, depression, anxiety, memory loss, visual disturbances, <br />irritability, hearing disturbances, skin issues, cardiovascular disorders, and dizziness. <br />They concluded, “We found that eight of the 10 studies reported increased prevalence of <br />adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer in populations living at distances < 500 <br />meters [1640 ft] from base stations.” The authors conclude, “None of the studies <br />reported exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggesting that current <br />guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of human populations. We believe <br />that comprehensive epidemiological studies of long-term mobile phone base station <br />exposure are urgently required to more definitively understand its health impact.” Very <br />few studies have been done of health effects before and after cell tower placement but <br />here are a few. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.