Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br />City of Redwood City (0011239.02)16 Woodard & Curran, Inc. <br />Sanitary Sewer Capacity Master Plan November 2023 <br />model results indicated surcharging that has not been visually observed in the system (confirmation level 2). <br />In these cases, the City may wish to conduct additional investigation to further verify the project need and <br />sizing. Verification could be conducted by temporary flow or surcharge monitoring during wet weather periods. <br />•Assessment of rehabilitation effectiveness. If the City conducts extensive repairs and rehabilitation within <br />a relatively small area with a well-defined drainage area, conducting flow monitoring both before and after the <br />rehabilitation efforts could provide valuable insight into how effective the rehabilitation has been in reducing <br />RDI/I. If rehabilitation efforts are less concentrated, however, with work in various areas around the City, or if <br />the drainage area is not well defined, with potential flow splits affecting flow coming into the basin, limited <br />monitoring to try to assess rehabilitation effectiveness is not likely to be informative. In this scenario, the City <br />would be better served by conducting periodic system-wide flow monitoring (perhaps every five years) in <br />conjunction with a model calibration update to update RDI/I parameters. <br />•Confirmation of flow prior to major developments. On occasion, it may be appropriate for the City to <br />conduct temporary monitoring to verify flows in a pipe that is expected to be affected by a major development. <br />Such monitoring is typically brief (2 to 3 weeks) and focused on dry weather capacity. <br />•Model calibration update. The City will be relying on the new, all-pipe model developed for this Master Plan <br />for a number of purposes. Periodically updating the model loads and the model calibration as development <br />changes and as the City’s sewer rehabilitation efforts continue will be important for the model to continue to be <br />useful in the future. For the purpose of keeping the model up-to-date, periodic system-wide flow monitoring is <br />far more effective and provides a much sounder basis for updating the model calibration than limited annual <br />monitoring. <br />Selecting appropriate, hydraulically suitable flow monitoring locations is critical for obtaining accurate data. An effective <br />approach to select sites with the best hydraulics possible is to first identify where sites are needed to serve the intended <br />purpose of monitoring. Then review the sewer network data in the vicinity to identify what appears to be the best specific <br />manhole for metering, but also determine how far upstream or downstream of this site the meter could be installed and <br />still capture the flow intended. This way, if the selected site does not look ideal upon site investigation, the flow monitoring <br />contractor can further investigate upstream or downstream to identify a manhole that would provide more suitable <br />hydraulic conditions. <br />Any flow monitoring conducted during wet weather needs reliable rainfall data to be useful. If there are no local, reliable <br />rain gauges available, temporary rain gauge(s) should be installed as part of the flow monitoring program. <br />ATTY/RESO.0077/CC RESO SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN - EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 07-14-25 LF <br /> <br />Page 105 of 317