My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2025.08.25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
AgdaPkt 2025.08.25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2025 12:40:02 PM
Creation date
8/26/2025 12:35:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
8/25/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
8/26/2025 12:40 PM
Modified:
8/26/2025 12:40 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
663
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 6 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />3. No more than 15% of City funds granted can be used for administrative costs. <br />4. The amount of funds requested cannot represent more than 20% of cost of the program for <br />which funding is being requested. <br />5. Minimum application and funding award amount is $10,000. <br />6. All recipients agree to actively participate in City efforts to coordinate and improve human <br />services within the City. <br />7. The program described must respond to a basic human need. <br />These criteria are very similar to those defined in the Fiscal Year 2003-04 NOFA. One change is the $10,000 <br />minimum award, which was not included in the early decades of the program, but was added when the <br />HSFA program was restored in Fiscal Year 2015-16. The other change is that the definition of “basic human <br />need” has broadened over time. The Fiscal Year 2003-04 NOFA included specific language related to the <br />funding priorities of homeless/housing, emergency assistance, supportive services, disabled, seniors, and <br />youth. While the current language is less prescriptive, simply stating, “The program described must <br />respond to a basic human need,” the focus remains on funding activities that are vital for survival and not <br />simply improvements to quality of life. <br />While the goals, philosophy, and eligibility criteria have been consistent over time, the HHCC has used a <br />variety of rating criteria to evaluate applications over the years. The table below summarizes the points <br />systems HHCC members have used over the years prior to the adoption of the current scoring rubric <br />(Attachment C to this report) in Fiscal Year 2019-20. <br />Table 1: HSFA Application Scoring Criteria, FY2004-05 to FY2018-19 <br /> <br />FY2004-05 to <br />FY2006-07 <br />FY2007-08 to <br />FY 2009-10 <br />FY2010-11 to <br />FY 2012-13 <br />FY2015-16 to <br />FY2018-19 <br />FY2019-20 to <br />FY 2025-26^ <br />Eligibility 10 25 <br />Basic <br />Human Need 25 25 25 <br />Bang for <br />Buck 25 25 25 25 <br />5 <br />Program <br />Effectivenes <br />s 20 <br />20 <br />Impact/ <br />Program <br />Outcomes 35 20 25 <br />10 <br />Equal <br />Opportunity/ <br />Equal <br />Access/ <br />Affirmative <br />Marketing 15 <br />15 <br />Collaboratio <br />n/ Outreach 15 15 25 30 15 <br />9.C. - Page 3 of 27 <br />456
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.