Laserfiche WebLink
Page 9 of 12 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />Moreover, based on conversations with industry professionals, it is estimated that five to six large <br />employers have expressed interest in leasing existing commercial space in the City but ultimately <br />decided not to, in part due to the GI requirements. <br />2.Competitiveness with Neighboring Jurisdictions: Since the City Council meeting on September <br />23, 2024, staff has researched whether neighboring jurisdictions have GI requirements for <br />commercial remodels. Although some jurisdictions indicated they are analyzing this approach, <br />staff has not identified any cities to date with similar requirements. <br />3.Current Commercial Vacancy Rates: Per data published by Cushman & Wakefield on July 31 for <br />the second quarter of 2025, Redwood City’s commercial vacancy rate in and around downtown <br />reached 35%, significantly higher than Palo Alto (9.4%), Menlo Park (24.5%), and Mountain View <br />(28.5%). In the same period, Redwood Shores’ vacancy rate rose slightly to 17.1% from 16.8%. <br />Vacancy rates in Redwood City are expected to increase further in the second half of 2025 as large <br />office developments, such as Elco Yards, become fully available. <br />Rationale for Staff Recommendation <br />In asking the City Council to consider suspending the GI requirements for commercial remodels, staff seek <br />to balance two of the Guiding Principles in the City’s Strategic Plan: economic development and <br />sustainability. Staff offers the following rationale for the staff recommendation: <br />1.Current Policy Exceeds Requirements: The City’s GI policies, particularly those for new <br />development, have allowed the City to exceed the minimum MRP requirements. In other words, <br />the City has effectively captured and treated more runoff from new developments than required <br />by the MRP, helping to compensate for runoff that was not captured through alternate <br />commercial remodel means. <br />2.Current Policy Puts Redwood City at a Competitive Disadvantage for Investment: There are no <br />other cities with a similar requirement at this time. It is possible that the Regional Water Board <br />will eventually require all jurisdictions with MRPs to adopt policies mandating GI requirements for <br />all commercial remodels. If that occurs, all jurisdictions would implement these policies <br />simultaneously, placing agencies on equal footing. Until and unless that occurs, Redwood City is <br />at a competitive disadvantage to other cities, forsaking the private investment that could <br />strengthen the City’s economy and tax base. <br />3.Current Policy is Cost-Prohibitive: Small tenant improvement projects often have limited <br />budgets. Requiring green infrastructure could place an additional financial burden on businesses, <br />especially those already facing economic strain. <br />Additional Measures Staff is Researching <br />In addition to the GI requirements outlined in this report, staff—responding to feedback from businesses <br />and other stakeholders—are reviewing other policies that may impede the leasing of commercial space <br />in Redwood City. One area of particular concern for many small businesses is the City’s policy requiring <br />extensive upgrades when improvements are made to more than 50% of an existing building’s square <br />10.A. - Page 9 of 31 <br />218