My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2025.10.13 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
AgdaPkt 2025.10.13 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 2:44:53 PM
Creation date
10/14/2025 2:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/13/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City 2025 Public Health Goal Report <br />3 <br />less than the DLR should be considered zero. This approach is consistent with DDW practice <br />for treating non-detected results as zero. <br /> <br />Water Quality Data Reviewed for this Report <br />Water quality data collected by the City of Redwood City during 2022, 2023, and 2024 for <br />the purpose of determining compliance with drinking water standards were reviewed to <br />prepare this PHG report. This data was summarized in the 2022, 2023, and 2024 Annual <br />Water Quality Reports (also known as Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs)) which were <br />distributed to all customers through direct mail and are available on the City website. <br /> <br />Best Available Treatment Technology and Cost Estimates <br />Both the USEPA and DDW adopt Best Available Technologies (BATs) for the purpose of <br />reducing contaminant levels below the MCL. While a BAT may identify a process that can <br />reduce the presence of a contaminant, the cost of implementation can be a major factor in <br />deciding whether or not to adopt the process. For a system that is in compliance with MCL <br />levels, cost considerations must be a factor. Striving to keep contaminants below <br />PHG/MCLG levels must be evaluated with costs in mind. <br /> <br />Costs are estimated for the implementation of BATs for each constituent exceeding a PHG <br />or MCLG. The PHGs and MCLGs are set much lower than the MCL, and it is not always <br />possible or feasible to determine what treatment is needed to further reduce a constituent <br />to, or below, the PHG or MCLG. In some cases, such as when the MCLG or PHG is set at <br />zero, there may not be commercially available technology to reach that level. The issue is <br />further complicated because it is often not possible to verify by analytical means that the <br />contaminant has been totally eliminated. In some cases, installing a treatment technology <br />to try and further reduce very low levels of one constituent may, in turn, have adverse <br />effects on other aspects of water quality. This report presents the required cost estimates <br />to implement the BATs to reduce a contaminant to a level at or below the PHG/MCLG. <br /> <br /> <br />II. CONSTITUENTS DETECTED THAT EXCEED PHG OR MCLG <br />In reviewing water quality monitoring data collected during 2022, 2023, and 2024, City of <br />Redwood City staff have concluded that a PHG report is required that addresses the <br />contaminant lead. The following section presents a discussion of lead, which was detected <br />in customer’s homes at levels above the PHG. <br /> <br />LEAD <br />The PHG for lead is 0.2 parts per billion (ppb). Lead enters drinking water primarily through <br />leaching of lead-containing materials in household piping. The corrosion of household <br />plumbing systems such as those containing lead-based solder used to join copper pipe, <br />brass and chrome-plated brass faucets, lead pipe connections from homes to the water <br />9.B. - Page 11 of 27 <br />200
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.