My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2025.10.27 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
AgdaPkt 2025.10.27 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2025 3:13:24 PM
Creation date
10/28/2025 3:09:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/27/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
630
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Redwood City Stormwater Roadmap <br />Funding Program <br />September 2025 7-2 Schaaf & Wheeler <br />Table 7-2: Funding Instrument Strengths and Weaknesses <br />Type Strength Weakness <br />Tax <br />No substantial required findings <br />Most legally defensible 2/3 Voter Approval <br />Assessment Property Owner Majority Protest <br />1. Extensive Finding Requirements related to <br />defining the Benefits <br />2. Separation of General & Special Benefits <br />3. Allocation of costs shall be according to <br />the Proportional Special Benefits <br />conferred <br />4. Additional Assessment Engineering <br />Time/Expense to support required findings <br />5. Public Agency must Fund all General Benefit <br />costs, may be a substantial amount <br />6. May not exempt any parcels based on <br />ownership, publicly owned property may not <br />be exempt <br />7. Legally Vulnerable <br />Property- <br />Related Fee <br />Option to select approval group, <br />Property Owner majority protest <br />Legally defensible <br />1. If Registered Voters selected as approval <br />group, 2/3 Voter Approval <br />2. Publicly owned property may not be exempt <br />3. Findings of cost basis for fee <br />4. Legally Vulnerable <br />7.1.2 Tax and CFD <br />A Community Facilities District (CFD) can be formed pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community <br />Facilities Act of 1982. A CFD can fund capital projects as well as ongoing maintenance. Bonds <br />would be issued to pay for capital costs secured by a special tax levy. The same CFD can also <br />fund ongoing maintenance costs through a special tax levy. <br />A Parcel Tax can be formed under Government Code section 50078. A parcel tax works much in <br />the same manner as a CFD. However, the formation process requires fewer steps, and capital <br />costs are financed through revenue bonds and not direct special tax bonds. The CFD also has <br />the benefit of approval through a mailed ballot election on the date of the City’s choosing should <br />flexibility in timing be a consideration. <br />There is great flexibility in both the geographic area to be levied and the formula by which to levy <br />when using a CFD. A CFD may include non-contiguous geographic areas. There is no <br />requirement that the special tax is apportioned based on the benefit to any property. Property <br />owned by a public entity is generally exempt from the CFD special tax, ensuring no lingering <br />obligation of other City revenues. <br />Successful creation of a CFD requires the approval of two-thirds of registered voters voting in an <br />election. With a voter election, each voter has one vote, regardless of their weighted share of the <br />proposed special tax levy. In a landowner election, the vote is one vote per acre or portion <br />thereof. <br />11.A. - Page 33 of 53 <br />464
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.