Laserfiche WebLink
REV: 11-19-25 LR <br />This task provides alternatives for consideration based on the information collected <br />in Tasks 2, 3, 4, input considerations from model development and analysis from <br />Tasks 5 and 6, and early input from outreach conducted in Task 15 and Task 20. This <br />Task includes the following: <br />a. Task 9.a Prioritize Deficiencies: the Consultant will prioritize deficiencies based <br />on information collected in Task 3, the deficiency maps developed in Task 6, <br />and using information developed in Task 8 along with level 1 project costs. <br />Consultant will prioritize deficiencies based on a weighted scoring system <br />developed with the City’s project manager that considers flood risk, <br />infrastructure condition, and impacts. Consultant to propose the scoring <br />system to the City’s project manager and with feedback, Consultant to use it <br />to develop alternatives. The scoring system below is an example of what it <br />could include: <br />Flood Risk: <br />1. Degree of flooding impact: Higher impact = higher priority. <br />2. Increase in likely flood damage (future conditions): Accounts for <br />SLR and precipitation increases. <br />3. Flood frequency and severity: Locations with frequent flooding or <br />high flood depths/velocities score higher. <br />Infrastructure Condition: <br />1. Age and material: older or deteriorated culverts/channels (e/g/ <br />corroded pipes, cracked concrete) are prioritized. <br />2. Maintenance issues: Channels with chronic sedimentation or <br />debris blockages. <br />Socioeconomic Impact: <br />1. Proximity to critical infrastructure: Channels/culverts near <br />hospitals, schools, or major roads score higher. <br />2. Impact on vulnerable populations: Areas with low-income of flood- <br />prone communities are prioritized. <br />3. Economic disruption: Flooding affecting commercial areas or <br />transportation networks. <br />Adaptability to Future Conditions: <br />1. Ease of upgrading infrastructure to accommodate SLR and <br />increase rainfall. <br />2. Potential of green infrastructure integration (e.g., bioswales, <br />floodplain restoration) to enhance resilience. <br />The Consultant will use a scoring matrix such as the one above to sort <br />deficiencies and assign a priority score, considering both existing and future <br />conditions. To provide the City (City Engineer or designee, City’s Project <br />ATTY/AGR.2025.317/Wood Rodgers, Inc. (Page 22 of 77)