Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0080/PC RESO 590 VETERANS & 91 WINSLOW PROJECT <br />REV: 11-14-24 JB <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />provide bioswales and detention areas for stormwater treatment. <br /> <br />5. Vesting Tentative Map (TM2022-01): Pursuant to Municipal Code section <br />30.42 and Subdivision Map Act, the Planning Commission finds that none of the following <br />findings requiring or supporting denial of the Vesting Tentative Map Application apply to <br />the Project: <br /> <br />A. The map, design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are <br />inconsistent with the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, or <br />subdivision improvement requirements. <br /> <br />The map, design, or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with <br />the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and the subdivision improvement <br />requirements. The Project is not subject to a specific plan. <br /> <br />B. The site is not physically suited for the proposed type or density of <br />development. <br /> <br />The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of development as it <br />is flat and does not contain many natural features. The Project complies with the <br />density and zoning requirements and would provide sufficient on-site parking. <br /> <br />C. The design or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br />environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or <br />their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. <br /> <br />The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial <br />environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their <br />habitat, or cause serious public health problems. There is no known fish or wildlife <br />habitat near the Project. The Project would replace commercial uses with 95 <br />residential units and is not anticipated to adversely impact public health. <br /> <br />D. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will conflict with <br />essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the <br />proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public easements will be <br />provided. <br /> <br />The design or improvements will not conflict with essential public easements for <br />access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, unless <br />acceptable alternate public easements will be provided. <br /> <br />E. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for do not <br />comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the <br />tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such <br />exceptions. <br />