Reso25-02 0024 PC Reso 901 El Camino Real

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0024/PC RESO 901 EL CAMINO REV: 04-11-25 VR Page 5 of 20 recommend that the City Council find that the Project is exempt under CEQA and no further environmental review is required for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further determined that it desires to recommend that the City Council approve the Project by approving General Plan Amendments; DTPP Amendments; Affordable Housing Plan, Affordable Housing Partner, Land Donation and Land Donation Agreement; a Downtown Planned Community Permit, Use Permit, Planned Development Permit, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map with Conditions of Approval; and a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the increase of the DTPP Maximum Allowable Development office capacity via the General Plan and DTPP Amendments was previously studied and cleared under the SEIR and is consistent with and would further the purpose of and appropriately implement the General Plan and DTPP goals, policies, development Standards and Guidelines, and all other applicable provisions of the Redwood City Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council is empowered by Redwood City Municipal Code Chapter 18, Article XI, section 18.60 to amend the General Plan upon recommendation by an affirmative vote of four members of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council is empowered by Redwood City Zoning Code Article 52, section 52.5 to amend the DTPP upon recommendation by the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. Section 2. The Planning Commission, having independently heard, considered, and weighed all the evidence in the Record, finds that the above recitals are accurate and constitute findings in this matter, and together with the Project Record, have served as adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. Section 3. CEQA. In the exercise of its independent judgement, based on the facts and evidence in the Record, the Planning Commission finds that: a. The Consistency Checklist was prepared in accordance with all legal requirements. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed the Consistency Checklist and other information in the entire Record and has considered the information contained therein, including the written and oral comments