Reso25-05 0090 - PC Reso 1201 Main Street Mixed Use Project

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0090/PC RESO 1201 MAIN STREET MIXED USE PROJECT REV: 08-15-25 VR Page 8 of 32 a. The map, design, or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, or subdivision improvement requirements. The proposed subdivision and associated improvements are consistent with Redwood City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, and all applicable subdivision improvement requirements. b. The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of development. The project site is flat and located in an urban environment for which all public utilities and services are already established and the density is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning District as allowed by State Density Bonus Law. c. The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. The project site does not contain natural features or areas that would be considered habitat for fish or wildlife. The project site is already developed and located in an urbanized area. A CEQA Exemption Memorandum was prepared for the project which found that the project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section 15332 (Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The CEQA Compliance and Exemption Determination included a checklist analyzing potential environmental impacts of the project, and there exists substantial evidence demonstrating that the project will not have significant impacts on the environment and that it qualifies for the Class 15332 exemption. The CEQA Exemption Memorandum is attached to the staff report for this project and is hereby incorporated herein. d. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate public easements will be provided. The proposed tentative map and associated improvements do not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed project site. Additionally, the project site does not have any public utilities or associated improvements that would be in conflict with the proposed project. e. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such exceptions. No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. f. Such other findings conflict with written public policy or with the public interest as the Planning Commission may determine.