My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.04.13 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.04.13 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 10:57:15 AM
Creation date
4/14/2026 10:51:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/13/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
708
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> PART II, Page | 34 <br /> <br />Section 4. Project Evaluation (Percent of Total Value: 15%) Within this section, <br />address the criteria that defines the Project Evaluation Rating Factor (see table below) <br />in a cohesive, comprehensive, and concise narrative format. <br /> <br />Project Evaluation: The applicant described how it will collect data and evaluate the <br />effectiveness of the project. The elements that comprise this Rating Factor are listed <br />below. Addressing each element does not in itself merit a high rating; although each <br />element is to be addressed (when applicable), it is the quality of the response to each <br />that will be evaluated. The response will be evaluated with a single rating based on a <br />scale of 0-5. <br />4.1 <br />Describe the plan to determine the staff and/or entity that will be conducting the <br />project evaluation and how monitoring activities will be incorporated into the <br />various phases of the project (e.g., start-up, implementation, service delivery <br />period). <br />• Provide the qualifications of the staff or evaluator selected to evaluate <br />the project, as they relate to experience with evaluation, data collection, <br />analysis. <br />• If an evaluator is to be selected after the grant is awarded, specify the <br />process and criteria for selection. <br />• Describe the preliminary plan for monitoring the project to ensure that <br />the project components are implemented as intended. <br />4.2 <br />Describe the plan to collect data to measure the success and impact of your <br />project in line with the goals and objectives listed in the Work Plan (see Rating <br />Factor 2.2). If the outcomes you propose to track require you to collect data <br />from an outside entity, describe your plan for obtaining data and entering into <br />data sharing agreements if needed. <br /> <br /> <br />7.C. - Page 42 of 101 <br />101
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.