My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.04.13 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.04.13 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 10:57:15 AM
Creation date
4/14/2026 10:51:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/13/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
708
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> PART I, Page | 17 <br />contrasts with grantees’ evaluation of their grant-funded projects which focus on their <br />project’s specific goals and objectives. The primary data collection instrument for the <br />BSCC’s statewide evaluation will be the QPR and information gathered from grante es <br />through their LEPs, LERs, and interviews. <br /> <br />Quarterly Progress Reports <br />Grant recipients are required to submit QPRs to the BSCC. QPRs are a critical element <br />in the BSCC’s monitoring and oversight process and the primary data collection tool for <br />the BSCC’s statewide evaluation. <br /> <br />A brief outline of the types of information and data grantees will be required to report <br />through the QPRs follows. Once grants are awarded, BSCC staff will update the design <br />of the QPR to ensure the data collected reflects the projects that were funded. Ap plicable <br />forms and instructions will be available to grantees on the BSCC’s website after the <br />Grantee Orientation. <br /> <br />Types of data and information gathered through the QPRs: <br />• Grantee progress in implementing common project implementation activities (i.e., <br />partnerships, staffing, training, enforcement activities, public safety activities, data <br />collection/evaluation and quality assurance). For each activity, grantees will report <br />their implementation status (not yet started, planning, implementation started, <br />complete/established, N/A) and provide a narrative description of their progress, <br />accomplishments, and/or challenges. <br />• Grantee progress in achieving their project’s goals and objectives. For each goal <br />and its associated objectives, grantees will describe their progress toward <br />achieving the goal, any challenges achieving the goal or objectives, and, if <br />applicable, how the challenges are being addressed. <br />• Aggregate data for project activities and participants, if applicable, including: <br />o Activities undertaken and/or services provided or received during the <br />reporting period by specific categories (e.g., storefront closures, nuisance <br />abatement, environmental remediations, community surveys, community <br />educational events, inspections, complaints responded to, etc.). <br />o For project’s that plan to serve participants: Demographic information for <br />age, gender identity, race or ethnicity, risk level, education, and employment <br />status. <br />o Outcomes achieved (e.g., sustained closures, remediations completed, <br />deterrence effects observed, number of inspections completed, number of <br />illegal cultivation areas identified, number of youth with reduced assessed <br />risk status, number of youth with reduced frequency of cannabis use, <br />number of public awareness campaigns initiated, other positive outcomes). <br />7.C. - Page 25 of 101 <br />84
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.