Agda Pkt 2026.04.13 Joint SA PFA

Browse Search

PART I, Page | 26 Scoring Panel members will rate an applicant’s response to each Rating Factor on a scale from 0 to 5, according to the Six-Point Rating Scale shown below. Each Rating Factor then will be weighted according to the Percent of Total Value associated with the Rating Factor to arrive at the final Weighted Rating Factor Score. The Weighted Rating Factor Scores are then added together for a Total Score. The maximum possible proposal score is 200 (not including priority points). Six Point Rating Scale Scoring Threshold/Minimum Score To be considered for funding, a proposal must meet a threshold of 50 percent (70%) of the maximum rating factor score, i.e., a minimum score of 100 total points (before the addition of priority points), to be considered for funding. Priority Points Revenue and Taxation Code section 34019, subdivision (f)(3)(C), mandates that the “Board of State and Community Corrections shall prioritize grant awards for local governments whose grant application includes illicit cannabis enforcement.” For the purposes of the Prop 64 Grant Cohort 4 RFP, the BSCC will provide an additional 20 points to the final weighted score of an applicant’s proposal, if that applicant budgets a minimum of 70 percent of its total grant fund request for illicit cannabis enforcement activities, under Project Purpose Area 1 (Public Safety/Enforcement). Additional instructions will be provided in the Project Budget Attachment. An applicant can earn priority points only after the minimum scoring threshold is met. If awarded Prop 64 Grant Cohort 4 funding, the applicant’s proposed budget will be incorporated by reference into the BSCC Grant Agreement. Therefore, grant recipients who were provided priority points MUST maintain a minimum of 70 percent of its project expenditures on illicit cannabis enforcement activities in order to continue receiving grant - funded reimbursements. 7.C. - Page 34 of 101 93