Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Schwob personally telephoned Stephen Burns on June 6, 2025 to say <br />“the agreement is off.” Mr. Craig’s admission also confirms he was acting <br />under instruction from supervisors — meaning the repudiation was <br />institutional, not a junior-staff misunderstanding. <br />Christian Craig email, May 1, 2025 — “I reaffirmed this with <br />Jeff in January when the resubmission was received” <br />Verbatim text: <br />“Hi Stephen, <br />The last line of Jeff’s email asks for documentation from the Public <br />Works department approving the gate relocation. Public Works has <br />asked that the original access be restored so that is the instruction <br />that should be followed. I reaffirmed this with Jeff in January <br />when the resubmission was received. <br />While some of the points outlined below may be valid, addressing <br />these items and restoring the original access are not mutually <br />exclusive. And in my opinion, should be approached from a point of <br />legal construction. Additionally, without having permitted the slab <br />6.A. - Page 54 of 64 <br />56