My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agda Pkt 2026.07.07 Special Council Meeting
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agda Pkt 2026.07.07 Special Council Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 12:12:40 PM
Creation date
7/8/2026 12:10:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/7/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING ORDINANCE <br /> <br />Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9 Tenant Protection Impacts <br />As summarized in Table 3, the most significant financial impact of tighter just <br />cause eviction protections will most likely fall on pre-1995 buildings. This is <br />because building operators (e.g., landlords, property managers, investors) will <br />would have limited ability to raise rents to off-set potential compliance impacts <br />(e.g., lost revenue, increased liability, legal fees, etc.). In contrast, post-1995 <br />market rate operators can raise rent on problem tenants, consistent with more <br />generous State limits, to incentivize a voluntary move-out. <br />Table 3. Summary of Potential Impacts from Tighter Eviction Controls <br />Type and Incidence of <br />Impact Description of Ordinance’s Potential Impacts <br />Building or Unit Operating Costs <br />(all units) <br />Potential for sporadic cost increases to landlords from compliance but <br />difficult to quantify change relative to existing requirements. <br />Post 1995 Market Rate Multi- <br />Family Rental Buildings <br />May increase costs and affect building desirability to higher income <br />tenants, but change from existing law appears minimal and can be <br />mitigated over time with rent increases <br />Pre-1995 Multi-Family Market <br />Rate Rental Buildings <br />Larger potential impacts to landlords because their allowed rent <br />increases are more limited but change from existing law appears <br />minimal <br />Deed Restricted Affordable <br />Housing (pre and post 1995) <br />May conflict with pre-existing regulatory requirement related to tenant <br />income restrictions (see Chapter 4) <br />Single-Family, condos, and ADUs <br />Because State and local laws currently provide more exemptions for <br />these units, the Ordinance may incentivize some owners to remove <br />units from the rental market <br />New Housing Production (City <br />Regional Housing Needs <br />Allocation (RHNA) Targets)6 <br />May affect the investment climate for rental housing due to perceived <br />incremental increase in costs and risks <br /> <br /> <br />6 Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) process is number of housing units and the affordability of those units, each local <br />government must plan for in its Housing Element. <br />8.A. - Page 68 of 168 <br />78
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.