Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.2A <br />Page 27 <br /> <br />The proposed Project includes two decommissioning variants for portions of BDPL Nos. 1 and 2 <br />Historic District (HR-l). The "decommission in place" option would result in significant <br />impacts on HR-l after the BDPL No.5 warranty period expires when the Bay crossing segment <br />of the pipelines would be removed from service. Because the Bay Tunnel would be designed to <br />last for at least 100 years, the pipelines would no longer be used and could eventually fall into <br />disrepair. Although the time frame for this impact could be beyond the life of the proposed <br />replacement tunnel, decommissioning in-place would result in significant impacts because it <br />could cause a substantial adverse change in the historical significance of this historical resource. <br />The impacts from decommissioning would materially impair the characteristics of HR-l that <br />make it eligible for the NRHP and CRHR. <br /> <br />. Mitigation Measure CR-4a: If decommissioning in-place is selected for the Bay-crossing <br />reach ofBDPL Nos. 1 and 2~ record all contributors to the BDPL Nos. 1 and 2 Historic <br />District in accordance with Level II of the HABS/HAER standards <br />. Mitigation Measure CR-4b: Develop interpretive materials; install interpretive displays <br />at the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge and/or the Ravenswood <br />Open Space Preserve <br /> <br />Impact CR-5: Construction impacts on unique paleontological resources. <br /> <br />The proposed Project would require excavation through rock units that have high potential for <br />containing significant fossiliferous resources from milepost 0.0 to 7.1 (i.e., entire eastern <br />segment) and 7.5 to 13.5 (i.e., most of the eastern portion of the western segment). Because the <br />proposed alignment would be located in high sensitivity areas, construction, including <br />excavation and tunneling, could destroy unique paleontological resources, which would be a <br />significant impact. <br /> <br />. Mitigation Measure CR-5a: Conduct construction worker training <br />. Mitigation Measure CR-5b: Suspend Project construction, as necessary; undertake <br />resource salvage operations. <br /> <br />Impact CR..6: Construction impacts on human remains. <br /> <br />Portions of the pipeline alignment would be constructed within land that has not previously been <br />disturbed, and construction could disturb human remains. Any remains found during <br />construction in the study area would have been interred outside a formally recorded cemetery, <br />and their disturbance would result in a significant impact. <br /> <br />. Mitigation Measure CR -1 d would mitigate impacts relating to potential impacts on <br />human remains. <br /> <br />Impact HAZ-l: Potentially significant exposure of the public to hazardous building <br />materials caused by demolition activities. <br /> <br />Various SFPUC structures and unauthorized encroachments into the right of way would be <br />removed or demolished prior to construction. These encroachments may contain hazardous <br />building materials such as lead-based paint; asbestos-containing materials or electrical equipment <br />containing PCBs; fluorescent light tubes containing mercury; and fluorescent light ballasts <br />containing PCBs. The disturbance of asbestos-containing materials could result in exposing the <br />public or construction workers to airborne asbestos fibers, unless proper asbestos abatement <br />precautions are taken. Similarly, if lead-based paint or other hazardous materials have <br />delaminated or chipped from the surface of the building materials, there would be a potential for <br />airborne particulates to be released unless proper abatement procedures are followed. If the <br />buildings to be demolished contain electrical equipment or lighting with PCBs, leakage could <br /> <br />17 <br />