Laserfiche WebLink
<br />findings or determinations. It depends upon the purpose for which the information <br />system exists and the type of information it contains. If the purpose of the system <br />is to collect and share information with other law enforcement agencies on <br />individuals reasonably suspected of involvement in criminal activity, and the <br />information is identifying or descriptive information about the individual and the <br />suspected criminal activity, then the system is a criminal intelligence system for <br />purposes of the regulation. Only those criminal intelligence systems that receive, <br />store and provide for the interagency exchange and analysis of criminal <br />intelligence information in a manner consistent with this regulation are eligible for <br />funding support with Crime Control Act funds. Comment <br /> <br />Response: No. A CHRI system contains information collected on arrests, <br />detention, indictments, informations or other charges, dispositions, sentencing, <br />correctional supervision, and release. It encompasses systems designed to <br />collect, process, preserve, or disseminate such information. CHRI is factual, <br />historical and objective information which provides a criminal justice system <br />"profile" of an individual's past and present involvement in the criminal justice <br />system. A fugitive file is designed to provide factual information to assist in the <br />arrest of individuals for whom there is an outstanding want or warrant. Criminal <br />intelligence information, by contrast, is both factual and conjectural (reasonable <br />suspicion), current and subjective. It is intended for law enforcement use only, to <br />provide law enforcement officers and agencies with useful information on criminal <br />suspects and to foster interagency coordination and cooperation. A criminal <br />intelligence system can have criminal history record information in it as an <br />identifier but a CHRI system would not contain the suspected criminal activity <br />information contained in a criminal intelligence system. This distinction provides <br />the basis for the limitations on criminal intelligence systems set forth in the <br />operating policies. Because criminal intelligence information is both conjectural <br />and subjective in nature, may be widely disseminated through the interagency <br />exchange of information and cannot be accessed by criminal suspects to verify <br />that the information is accurate and complete, the protections and limitations set <br />forth in the regulation are necessary to protect the privacy interests of the <br />subjects and potential subjects of a criminal intelligence system. Comment: <br />Another commentor asked whether a law enforcement agency's criminal <br />intelligence information unit, located at headquarters, which authorizes no <br />outside access to information in its intelligence system, would be subject to the <br />regulation. Response: No. The sharing of investigative or general file information <br />on criminal subjects within an agency is a practice that takes place on a daily <br />basis and is necessary for the efficient and effective operation of a law <br />enforcement agency. Consequently, whether such a system is described as a <br />case management or intelligence system, the regulation is not intended to apply <br />to the exchange or sharing of such information when it takes place within a single <br />law enforcement agency or organizational entity. For these purposes, an <br />operational multi-jurisdictional task force would be considered a single <br />organizational entity provided that it is established by and operates under a <br />written memorandum of understanding or interagency agreement. The definition <br />of "Criminal Intelligence System" has been modified to clarify this point. However, <br /> <br />WEISS West Bay Region Node MOU Agreement <br /> <br />Page 34 of 48 <br />