My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-03-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-03-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2010 2:43:38 PM
Creation date
3/4/2010 1:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.3C <br /> <br />may withdraw funds from the trust, as needed, to pay retiree medical benefits. Also, if Page 2 <br />the City were ever able to completely extinguish its retiree medical liability, any funds <br />remaining in the trust would be returned to the City. <br /> <br />Trustee Selection Process <br />Staff developed a request for proposal (RFP) for trustee services and sent this to the <br />following organizations, each of which submitted a proposal: <br />- Public Agency Retirement System (PARS) <br />- California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) <br />- Wells Fargo Bank <br />- US Bank <br />- International City Management Association (leMA) <br /> <br />Staff narrowed this group of proposers from five to two based upon our experience with <br />PARS and PERS and based upon fees. <br /> <br />The following table summarizes the key elements of the proposals from PERS and <br />PARS: <br /> <br />PERS <br /> <br />Number <br />of Clients <br />216 <br /> <br />Assets under <br />Management <br />$1.13 Billion <br /> <br />Fees <br />($M = millions) <br />07M08 - 0.020/0 <br />08-09 - 0.060/0 <br />< 0.20 010 <br /> <br />Period Commitment <br /> <br />3 year lock unless <br />early withdrawal <br />approved by PERS <br /> <br />120 days written <br />notice <br /> <br />PARS <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />$126 Million <br /> <br />< $5M M 0.600/0 <br />$5MM $10M - 0.500/0 <br />$10M - $15M - 0.400/0 <br />$15M - $50M - 0.15% <br />>$50M - 0.10010 <br /> <br />As more funds accumulate in the trust, the cost difference between PARS and PERS <br />widens as can be seen by the projections in the following table: <br /> Projected Average Cash <br /> Ending Fund Balance PARS PERS Difference <br /> Balance <br /> $ $ $ $ $ <br />6/30/2009 2,100,000 <br />6/30/2010 3,900,000 3,000,000 18,000 1 ,800 -16,200 <br />6/30/2011 5,700,000 4,800,000 28,800 2,880 -25,920 <br />6/30/2012 7,500,000 6,600,000 33,000 3,960 -29,040 <br />6/30/2013 9,300,000 8,400,000 42,000 5,040 -36,960 <br />6/30/2014 11,100,000 10,200,000 51,000 6, 120 -44,880 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.