My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-03-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-03-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2010 2:43:38 PM
Creation date
3/4/2010 1:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Attachment 2 6.3C <br />Page 1 0 <br /> <br />Attachment t <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />Background <br />In June 2004, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASS) issued Statement <br />Number 45 providing new requirements for the accounting and financial reporting by <br />employers for post employment benefits other than pensions (OPES). This new statement <br />is similar to previous GASa guidance for pensions in that it requires the recognition of the <br />cost of post employment benefits during the years of an employee's active years of service <br />to the City. Under GASS 45, if the costs are recognized and funded during an employee's <br />active years of service, then in theory. when the employee retires, the funds required to <br />pay for the retiree's health would have been previously accumulated and would then be <br />available for the actual health premium payments. <br /> <br />The City currently provides one post employment benefit in the form of health insurance for <br />retirees. This benefit is currently accounted for on a llpay-as-you-go" basis, which means <br />that costs are recognized as payments are made. Therefore, the City is currently <br />recognizing only the health insurance costs associated with the actual retiree health <br />insurance payments being made, and not recognizing the costs of this benefit for active <br />employees. The City currently pays for the health insurance of 268 retirees, and it is <br />projected that the 2006-07 "pay-as-you-go" amount for this benefit will be $1.3 million. <br /> <br />To determine the costs of OPES, GASS 45 requires a biennial actuarial valuation of <br />benefits. The City retained Bartel Associates to prepare this valuation. The actuarial <br />valuation calculates the Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL), or the discounted value of <br />benefits earned by employees to-date, the Actuarial Value of Assets (AVA) which is the <br />value of assets available to fund the AAL (the city currently has no assets), the Unfunded <br />Actuarial Liability (UAL) which represents the difference between the AAL and the AVA, <br />and the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) which is the actuarially determined <br />contribution requirement. The ARC consists of the value of benefits earned during the year <br />(the normal cost) plus amortization of the UAL over a period not to exceed 30 years. A <br />discount rate is utilized in actuarial calculations and represents the estimated interest <br />earnings on accumulated funds that will offset the OPES costs. This discount rate ranges <br />from 4.25% for assets held by the City and pooled with the City's investments, or 70/0 for <br />assets held in an irrevocable trust (most likely placed with a trustee). The irrevocable trust <br />provides a higher discount rate as these assets are restricted solely for OPES, and are <br />invested In securities with longer-term maturities. The use of the higher discount rate <br />results in a lower ARC. However, by entering into an irrevocable trust agreement, the City <br />loses access to those funds. <br /> <br />GASS 45 does not require the City to fully fund the ARC, however, any unfunded portion <br />must be recorded as a liability in the Enterprise Funds (Water, Sewer, Parking and Port <br />Funds), and in the Statement of Net Assets for the Governmental Funds (General Fund, <br />Redevelopment Agency, etal.). Additionally, any unfunded ARC will increase subsequent <br />ARC calculations when the next biennial valuation is performed. The City may choose to <br />fund the ARC at any level, from zero to fully funded. Any amount of the ARC funded over <br />the current "pay-as-you-go" amount will trigger the need for the City to report these funds in <br />a pension trust fund, unless the City utilizes an outside administrator, in which case the <br />plan administrator will account for and invest these funds (at the previously mentioned <br />higher discount rate). <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.