Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7B <br />Page 47 <br /> <br /> <br />Eligible projects Include shuttle service operations, various ele- <br />ments of mobility management, transit capital for bus pro- <br />curements and bus stop improvements, and ridesharing and <br />carpooling. <br /> <br />In Cycle One Tier One of the lifeline Grant process, the City <br />of East Palo and Daly City were successful proposers with <br />$418,847 going to East Palo Alto and $368,929 going to Daly <br />City.9 <br /> <br />Local Cit~ Ootlons <br /> <br />Different cities have utilized an array of different funding source <br />to support their own commute alternatives programs. The City <br />of Menlo Park utilizes redevelopment funds to support their <br />community-based shuttle program. <br /> <br />The City of Menlo Park also utilizes developer impact fees to <br />support the matching funds for employer-based shuttle pro- <br />grams. There must be a rationale nexus between the impact fee <br />and the specific shuttle program being provided. <br />As the managers of local mobility programs for different cities, <br />the Alliance could possibly tap into some of these funds to help <br />support specific community-based shuttle efforts. <br /> <br />Private Foundations and Grants <br /> <br />The most likely foundations to fund Alliance programs will be <br />local Foundations such as the Silicon Valley Community Foun- <br />dation or a Foundation based in a local corporation. They will <br />most likely be sympathetic to requests for funding local, innova- <br />tive programs that fit their areas of interest. The Alliance could <br />partner with local non-profits for these grant applications. <br /> <br />Q These were original awards, and are being adjusted in the final funding agreements. <br /> <br />45 <br />