My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
RecDoc 2010-040907
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Recorded Docs 2010-2012
>
2010
>
RecDoc 2010-040907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2010 2:43:18 PM
Creation date
4/30/2010 2:43:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Recorded Docs
Recorded Docs - Type
Amendment
Subject
Permit No. 6-94 Amendment No.6 San Francisco Bay
Doc Num
2010-040907
Rec Date
4/15/2010
Parties
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Com
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PERMIT NO. 6-94 . <br />(Issued on July 24, 1996, As <br />Amended Through March 4, 2010) <br />AMENDMENT NO. SIX <br />(Exclusive of Amendment No. Four) <br />City of Redwood City and <br />Keech Properties, LLC <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />USFWS. The permittees also believe that the alternative inland access route is <br />consistent with the Bay Plan Policies on public access which state that "public access <br />to some natural areas should be provided to permit study and enjoyment of these <br />areas (e.g., by boardwalks or piers in or adjacent to some sloughs or marshes). <br />However, some wildlife may be sensitive to human intrusion. For this reason, <br />projects in such areas should be carefully evaluated in consultation with appropriate <br />agencies to determine the appropriate location and type of access to be provided." <br /> <br />The Commission staff reviewed the information that the USFWS relied on to support <br />their recommendation that public access on the exterior levee be restricted. Surveys <br />conducted since 1990 and anecdotal observations indicate the presence of the <br />California Clapper Rail in the tidal marshes outboard of the levees at the tip of <br />Redwood Shores peninsula and the Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse in the vicinity of the <br />project. The 1984 recovery plan for both endangered species identifies the tidal <br />marshes in and around Bair Island (immediately south of the Redwood Shores <br />peninsula), including Bird Island and the marshes at the mouth of Steinberger <br />Slough, as habitat essential to the survival and recovery of the clapper rail and <br />harvest mouse. The recovery plan also identifies the need for effective management <br />of marshes supporting rail and mouse populations within the Refuge as a <br />requirement for reducing the likelihood of extinction. <br /> <br />The USFWS recommendation that access be restricted is based on the assumption <br />that the strengthened levees would not only protect existing development, but <br />would also allow future development. It is the USFWS' opinion that the likely future <br />development would eliminate the current! y existing buffer space between <br />endangered species habitat and adjacent urban space, lead to increased human <br />disturbance to the clapper rails and harvest mice along the rebuilt levee, and increase <br />food availability and habitat for predators, such as rats, feral and domestic cats, <br />raccoons and red fox which all could prey on the rail and harvest mice. A key <br />concern is that encroa'chment of urban development increases the population of <br />potential predators, while limiting the ability to control predators. <br /> <br />Recognizing the potential risk of increased human use of the levee on the California <br />Clapper Rail and the Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse, Commission staff explored a <br />number of design and management solutions with the USFWS in an effort to <br />maintain access to all, or at least a greater portion, of the levee. Alternatives <br />proposed included: (a) seasonal closure of portions of the trail during breeding <br />season or periods of high tide; (b) construction of predator control fence with self- <br />closing gates to limit predator access to sensitive wildlife areas; (c) closure of the <br />access areas during predator control operations; (d) a requirement that dogs be on <br />leash; (e) a prohibition against dogs on the levee trail; and (f) allowing closure of <br />levee segments III, IV, VI, and most of VII, where large inland buffers would remain <br />and where rails have been frequently sighted, while allowing continued access on <br />levee segment V adjacent to Lido parcel one, where the proximity of homes to the <br />levee would hamper predator control. These and other suggested alternatives did <br />not satisfy USFWS concerns regarding the impacts of public access on these two <br />endangered species. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.