My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res10 P-2095
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Port Commission
>
2010
>
Res10 P-2095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 12:29:40 PM
Creation date
5/5/2010 12:10:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
Port Authority
Date
4/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Less than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially With Less Than <br /> BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> 4. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> (a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat <br /> modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> status species in local or regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br /> natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations <br /> 0 0 El El <br /> or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service? , <br /> (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined <br /> by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to,marsh, <br /> vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological <br /> interruption,or other means? • <br /> (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or <br /> migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or <br /> 0 El El 0 <br /> migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery <br /> sites? <br /> (e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological ❑ El <br /> resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? <br /> (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, <br /> Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or ❑ ❑ ❑ �•'� <br /> state habitat conservation plan? . <br /> Impact Analysis: <br /> a) The proposed demolition and construction at the Multi-Agency Maritime Facility would occur in <br /> shallow-water aquatic habit,adjacent to riprap shoreline with sparse plant cover of individual plants <br /> growing within the interstitial spaces of the riprap(Figure 8). <br /> ANNIMMIIIIMPW <br /> -n'AY" <br /> , ..° _ <br /> tv <br /> _ ''. <br /> p1.1144 <br /> Figure 8 <br /> The project site and general vicinity was historically a salt marsh,this native habitat,however,has been <br /> significantly disturbed and altered,and there is little native vegetation remaining., <br /> Port of Redwood City Multi-Agency Maritime Facility 18 February 2010 <br /> Initial Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.