My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-06-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-06-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2010 10:12:30 AM
Creation date
6/10/2010 3:05:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7.A <br />Page 20 <br /> <br />Attachment 4 <br />Redwood City Community Workshop <br />High Speed Rail Alternative Analysis <br />Veterans Memorial Senior Center <br />Tuesday, May 11, 2010 <br />7:00 - 9:00 PM <br />MEETING NOTES <br />(prepared by Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center) <br /> <br />Purpose of the meeting: gather community comments/concerns/preferences on the HSR Alternatives <br />Analysis for folding into the City's official comment letter to the High Speed Rail Authority <br /> <br />Present: Council Members: Rosanne Foust, Jeffery Gee and Barbara Pierce; staff members Chu <br />Chang, Peter Delgado, Phong Du, Jill Ekas, Brian Lee, Saber Sarwary, Malcolm Smith, Jimmy <br />Tan, Peter Vorametsanti, Susan Wheeler, Dan Zack; approximately 50 members of the <br />community, and eight facilitators from the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center <br /> <br />Council Member Rosanne Foust <br />. Thanked everyone for attending <br />. Introduced elected/appointed officials present and their role in the meeting <br />. Introduced PCRC and their role <br />. Stated the purpose of the meeting and expectations <br />. Outlined the agenda for the meeting <br /> <br />Chu Chang provided a presentation on the High Speed Rail Alternatives Analysis and <br />answered questions from participants. <br /> <br />Facilitators from the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC) facilitated six small group <br />discussions guided around the following questions: <br />Questions: <br />1. What would be advantages of each of the track placemen t options? <br />. Aerial <br />. At-grade <br />. Trench (covered/uncovered) <br />. Tunnel <br />. Covered trench and aerial <br />2. What would be the challenges of each of the track placement options? <br />. Aerial <br />. At-grade <br />. Trench (covered/uncovered) <br />. Tunnel <br />. Covered trench and aerial <br />3. What other combinations would you like to be studied? Note: you have blank paper with example <br />diagramsl use that to draw your own for the either or both segments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.