Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.3 Ordinances (Second Reading/Adoption) <br /> <br />A. ORDINANCE No. 1130-350 OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AMENDING <br />ARTICLE 26 OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING CODE TO ALLOW FOR <br />GROUND FLOOR OFFICE USES AS PERMITTED USES IN THE CENTRAL <br />BUSINESS RETAIL (CBR) ZONING DISTRICT (First Reading/Introduction May <br />24, 2010; published June 10, 2010). <br /> <br />B. ORDINANCE NO. 2356 ADDING SECTION 41.15G TO AND AMENDING <br />SECTION 41.19B OF THE REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING <br />THE FLOOD PLAIN (First Reading/Introduction May 24, 2010; published June <br />4, 2010). <br /> <br />C. ORDINANCE NO. 1130-349 AMENDING ARTICLE VI R-2 (RESIDENTIAL <br />DUPLEX) ZONING DISTRICT OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING <br />ORDINANCE (First Reading/Introduction June 7, 2010; published June 11, <br />2010). <br /> <br />6.4 Section - Claims and Warrants <br /> <br />A. Claim from Temple Beth Jacob. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Reject subject claim. Minute Order 10-107 <br /> <br />B. Approve warrants dated through June 14, 2010 and usual and necessary <br />payments through June 21, 2010. Minute Order 10-108 <br /> <br />............................................................................... <br /> <br />7. STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />A. High Speed Rail Alternatives Analysis Comment Letter for Council <br />Concurrence. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Endorse the Council High Speed Rail Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations for <br />Redwood City's response to the High Speed Rail Authority regarding the <br />Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Report. Minute Order 10-109 <br /> <br />M/S Pierce/Bain. Motion carried unanimously by electronic vote with Council <br />Member Foust absent. <br /> <br />Mr. Chu Chang, Building, Infrastructure and Transportation Director, provided an overview <br />of the preliminary alternative analysis and multiple options. He spoke about the removal of <br />berm options in Redwood City and San Carlos; appreciation to the High Speed Rail <br />Authority; information they received from the two community meetings held, with <br />approximately 80 community member attendees, asking questions and expressing their <br />opinions and concerns to the High Speed Rail Authority. He also spoke about the vertical <br />alignment alternatives, grade separations, and the unique challenges in Redwood City <br />given the creeks; and, the conceptual plan and the impacts. The general preference is to <br />keep Caltrain and High Speed Rail low and covered as much as possible, to try to avoid <br />grade separations, and to maintain as much community connectivity as possible. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />June 14, 2010 <br />PAGE 4 <br />