My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-07-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-07-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2010 3:41:21 PM
Creation date
7/8/2010 2:54:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
7/12/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.1C <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Ms. Maureen Riordan <br />City of Redwood City <br /> <br />April 20, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />5. Evaluate the merits and limitations of the two Census sources regarding the <br />percentage of Redwood City's employment base that also reside in Redwood City. <br /> <br />6. Use the IMPLAN model to estimate local expenditure impacts to be generated by the <br />Stanford Project and each opportunity cost scenario. <br /> <br />7. Revise the fiscal, affordable housing, and childcare impact analyses to reflect the <br />findings of the evaluation of items 1 through 6 as well as: a) a Uto be selected" <br />estimate of the employee count for Stanford; and b) only a partial demolition of the <br />existing park to make way for Phase 1. <br /> <br />8. Prepare revised draft fiscal, child care, and affordable housing impact reports, The <br />fiscal report is also to include a qualitative discussion of construction impacts and the <br />factors impacting the probability of the opportunity cost scenarios. <br /> <br />In addition to these new requests, over the course of the assignment we have <br />undertaken other tasks that have been requested, but outside of our original scope. The <br />most costly of these requests consist of: 1) evaluating Phase 1 impacts in addition to <br />total build-out impacts; 2) evaluating a partial demolition scenario; 3) preparing an <br />additional draft report and response to staff questions; and 4) evaluating three <br />opportunity cost scenarios, while the contract refers to two scenarios. <br /> <br />Proposed Additional Budget <br /> <br />As detailed in the attached spreadsheet, we are requesting approximately $57,600 of <br />additional budget authorization to undertake the additional services, attend five <br />additional meetings, and prepare a third draft of the reports and three final reports. The <br />preparation of any additional analysis or attendance at additional meetings beyond what <br />is specified in the attached spreadsheet will be billed on a time and materials basis, in <br />accordance with the attached fee schedule. <br /> <br />We look forward to working with you to complete these evaluations and discussing any <br />questions or comments that you may have about this request. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> <br />j l / ,..-. <br />, ~-r /-:?(? -7 ~' ),,' 7 ~.- ~ <br />--D' bb' M K / ~''-l_ <br />e Ie . ern <br /> <br />900b-1040.doc; jf <br />99900 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.