My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-01-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-01-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 4:08:34 PM
Creation date
1/23/2003 4:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i i.A-3 <br />BUDGETflrom page1 ................ ............................... <br />The total VLF hit to cities: $553 million in <br />the current year, and $1.2 billion in FY 2003 -04. <br />(See related article on page 1 for detailed informa- <br />tion on how VLF is allocated. See also the Budget <br />Page on the League's website: www.cacities.org/ <br />budget.) Cities are concerned about the entire <br />VLF "take- away" not only because the impact on <br />counties ($700m in FY 02 -03 and $1.7b in FY 03- <br />04) could have a trickle -down effect, but more <br />importantly because the state is once again taking <br />away money that is not theirs: the constitution <br />dedicates VLF as a direct local revenue. <br />this total today are as high as $1.2 billion. The <br />state will use these funds to support schools; they <br />become part of the ERAF (Education Revenue <br />Augmentation Fund) shift of local property taxes <br />that has so dramatically altered local government's <br />ability to provide services and plan for future <br />growth. <br />League First Vice President, Ron Loveridge, <br />Mayor of Riverside, called the proposed redevelop- <br />ment fund raid "the wrong idea at the wrong time <br />for the California economy and its workers." <br />Public safety and other essential services are <br />clearly at risk with these cuts. On average two out <br />of every three dollars in cities' general funds are <br />dedicated to police, fire and EMS services. The <br />VLF makes up an average 16% of a California <br />city's general fund. The $1.2 billion cut in FY 2003- <br />04 could pay for 12,000 police officers, or 15,000 <br />firefighters. <br />Reacting to the VLF proposal, League Presi- <br />dent and Oakland City Attorney John Russo said, <br />"The state budget is clearly sick, but the patient <br />won't get better by stealing blood from city and <br />county budgets and taking cops and firefighters off <br />the street. The time has clearly come for the <br />legislature to keep its commitment and to end the <br />VLF tax holiday by returning the VLF rate to its <br />1998 level. Only this will help avoid absolutely <br />horrific public safety and other service cuts at the <br />local level across our state." <br />On average two out of every three of dollars in <br />cities' general funds are dedicated to police, fire <br />and EMS services. The VLF makes up an average <br />16% of a California city's general fund. The $1.2 <br />billion cut in FY 2003 -04 could pay for 12,000 <br />police officers, or 15,000 firefighters. <br />Other big hits to cities: an ongoing shift of <br />$250 million from the school district share of the <br />increased taxes (i.e., the "tax increment' property <br />taxes) going to redevelopment agencies for <br />financing of public works and housing projects. <br />The budget includes a statement of intent to <br />increase this shift until the full amount of the <br />school district share is diverted. Estimates on <br />"The Governor's State of the State speech <br />emphasized 'jobs, jobs and more jobs' ", continued <br />Loveridge. "If jobs are the goal, taking redevelop- <br />ment funds is one of the worst things to do. Rede- <br />velopment agencies are a principal source of <br />economic development and construction jobs in <br />the state. With historic low- interest rates, many <br />redevelopment agencies are poised to finance <br />public infrastructure improvement and housing <br />projects that will help jump -start the state <br />economy. Instead, the Governor's proposals will <br />shut down these efforts. <br />'This makes no sense. It would further damage <br />our economy." <br />In December the governor also proposed a <br />current year shift to the state general fund of $500 <br />million in "unencumbered" low and moderate <br />housing funds held by redevelopment agencies. <br />The League testified with local housing advocates <br />at a December legislative budget hearing that <br />"unencumbered" did not mean that funds were <br />uncommitted, and that their loss would spell doom <br />to many affordable housing projects in various <br />development stages around the state. This pro- <br />posal, and others recommended by the Governor <br />in December (totaling $10.2b) remain part of Davis' <br />total budget package and the Governor has asked <br />they be acted upon this month. <br />Another hit to cities: the loss of booking <br />fee reimbursements, costing cities $38 million. <br />In the early 1990's the state gave counties the <br />authority to charge cities for the counties' booking <br />Continued on Page 4 <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUSIPAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.