My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-01-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-01-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 4:08:34 PM
Creation date
1/23/2003 4:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q,2 kM <br />153.3 Level III - Anneal to Personnel Officer <br />153.3.1 If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level 11, the grievant <br />may within ten (10) days of the receipt of the decision at Level II <br />appeal the decision on the appropriate form to the Personnel Officer. <br />This statement shall include a copy of the original grievance and <br />appeal, and a clear, concise statement of the reasons for the appeal. <br />Evidence offered in support of a disciplinary grievance filed pursuant <br />to Section 15.2.3 of this MOU shall be submitted in the form of <br />written declarations executed under penalty of perjury. <br />15.3.3.2 The Personnel Officer shall communicate the decision to the grievant <br />within ten (10) days. If the Personnel Officer does not respond within <br />the time limits provided, the grievant may appeal to the next level. <br />15.3.4 Level IV - Bindine Arbitration <br />153.4.1 If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level III, the <br />grievant may within ten (10) days of the receipt of the decision submit <br />a request in writing to the Association for arbitration of the dispute. <br />Within twenty (20) days of the grievants receipt of the decision at <br />Level III, the Association shall inform the City of its intent as to <br />whether or not the grievance will be arbitrated. The Association and <br />the City shall attempt to agree upon an arbitrator. If no agreement can <br />be reached, they shall request that the State Conciliation Service <br />supply a panel of five names of persons experienced in hearing <br />grievances in cities. Each party shall alternately strike a name until <br />only one remains. The remaining panel member shall be the arbitrator. <br />The order of the striking shall be determined by lot. <br />15.3.4.2 If either the City or the Association so requests, a separate arbitrator <br />shall be selected to hear the merits of any issues raised regarding the <br />arbitrability of a grievance. No hearing on the merits of the grievance <br />will be conducted until the issue of arbitrability has been decided. The <br />process to be used in selecting an arbitrator shall be as set forth in <br />15.3.4.1. <br />15.3.4.3 The arbitrator shall, as soon as possible, hear evidence and render a <br />decision on the issue or issues submitted to him. If the parties cannot <br />agree upon a submission agreement, the arbitrator shall determine the <br />issues by referring to the written grievance and the answers thereto at <br />each step. <br />15.3.4.4 The City and the Association agree that the jurisdiction and authority <br />of the arbitrator so selected and the opinions the arbitrator expresses <br />will be confined exclusively to the interpretation of the express <br />provision or provisions of this MOU at issue between the parties. The <br />arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, subtract from, alter, amend, <br />or modify any provisions of this MOU or the written ordinances, <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.