My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2010 4:17:37 PM
Creation date
8/5/2010 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.2A <br /> <br />Agreement with PG&E is needed. Redwood City is in discussions with PG&E abo:~~e 10 <br />project and PG&E is agreeable to the work proposed but a finalized agreement has not <br />been completed. An agreement will be in place prior to programming. <br /> <br />Project design completed? <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No X <br /> <br />Preliminary design is complete but construction documents need to be fmalized. <br /> <br />Can the project be divided into phases or could it be partially funded. Please explain: <br /> <br />The proiect can be separated into two phases. The first phase would be the completion of <br />the path. This would include the required grading~ paving and site furnishings needed to <br />complete a safe usable path. <br /> <br />The second phase could include the aesthetic improvements to the path area. This would <br />include the landscape and irrigation improvements which would improve the nature and <br />character of the pathway. <br /> <br />If separated the first phase of the proiect would require $295..825.00 of funding and the <br />second phase would require $85~225.00 offunding. <br /> <br />Earliest year in which the proj ect can obtain E-76 approval from Caltrans? <br /> <br />Circle one: ~y 2010/20111 <br /> <br />FY 2011/2012 <br /> <br />Projects sponsor's preference as to which year the project sponsor would obtain E-76 <br />approval from Caltrans? <br /> <br />Circle one: ~Y 2010/20111 <br /> <br />FY 2011/2012 <br /> <br />SAFETY <br /> <br />How is safety improved because of the project? Explain: <br /> <br />Due to the various stages of deterioration of the existing trail there are several potential <br />trip and slip obstructions for cyclists and pedestrians. The proiect will remove these <br />potential obstructions by grading the trail and paving the path. This will provide a safe <br />and reliable surface for pedestrian and cyclist use. The addition of a fence will improve <br />the safety of the surrounding wetlands and prevent intrusion from visitors and pets. The <br />trail will also serve as a connection between the entrance of the Wildlife Refuge at the <br />end of Whipple Avenue and the parking lot at the end of Bair Island Road. Previously <br />people accessing the Refuge had to park along the side of the road at the end of Whipple <br />Avenue. This was very risky for visitors and their vehicle since there was only a very <br />minimal shoulder to park on. Visitors were required to walk in the roadway to access <br />their vehicles. . The new parking lot was built to remove this conflict but the trail between <br />the two locations was never completed. Through this proiect cyclists will have a safe <br />commute route that separates them from the traffic on East Bayshore Road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.