Laserfiche WebLink
54/ <br />REPORT <br />To the Redevelopment Agency <br />From the Executive D'. <br />February 10, 2003 <br />Subject <br />Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency to allow the Executive Director or designee to <br />approve purchases of all material, equipment, supplies and personal services of less than <br />$60,001 value of sales tax and freight. <br />Recommendation <br />It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors (Board) raise the <br />purchasing dollar limit requiring sealed bids and Board action to $60,001 excluding sales <br />tax and freight for purchases of materials, equipment, supplies and personal services. <br />Background <br />The City Council voted to raise the purchasing dollar limits for City actions in November <br />2002. The City and the Redevelopment Agency have operated with the same <br />administrative requirements since the Agency's inception, and this proposed action would <br />bring the Agency rules into conformance with those of the City. <br />Presently the Board must approve by resolution or motion all purchases of supplies, <br />equipment or professional services when the amount of such acquisition exceeds $10,000. <br />In most cases the Agency is entering into a professional service agreement rather that <br />purchasing supplies or equipment. The Board action is typically one of approving the <br />selection of a consultant to perform a professional service associated with a <br />redevelopment project. The dollar limit was established in the Redevelopment Agency s- <br />by -laws in 1982. This Board is therefore burdened with approval of purchases that <br />represent substantially less than $10,000 in 1982 dollars. <br />Staff is recommending these changes in an effort to operate more efficiently. Under the <br />current provisions of the Board's by -laws, time and attention is focused on securing Board <br />approvals for very routine business items. In addition, time is of the essence for many <br />redevelopment project professional service agreements and getting such agreements on <br />an Agency agenda can add two to three weeks to the approval process. In an effort to <br />operate more like a business, staff recommends that the Executive Director be vested with <br />more flexibility to conduct the day -to -day business operations of the Agency. <br />These recommended changes will also benefit the Board as the number of items in each <br />agenda packet will decrease which will allow Board members more time to focus on <br />important policy issues. We recognize that the Board members have limited time to <br />prepare for Board meetings and believe that asking the members to devote their time to <br />high "value- added" policy issues is a more effective use of your time. <br />