My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-08-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-08-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2013 12:55:23 PM
Creation date
8/19/2010 12:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/23/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 6.1 G <br /> Page 21 <br /> Veterans Slv�l @ Whipple Ave. <br /> '�4�8 Average Monthly Cifafions; �`54,�14 Average iS/lon�h Potertfia!City Revenue <br /> *Average was ca�culafed based on dafa November 2449 through March 20�0 <br /> Total Redwood C�ty <br /> 507 Average Monthly Citations; $65,636 Average Monf� Pofenfral Cify Revenue <br /> Fiesponse <br /> The C'rfiy disagrees partially with the finding. Tne City has had significant <br /> difficulty obtaining its portion of the fines from San Mateo County, and, as <br /> #he Grand Jury explains, "the transmittaf of the funds from the count}r fo <br />' the cities actuaify occurs some months later. In addition citation �ines may <br /> be reduced by the traffic court if appealed." In addition, some fines may <br /> never be collected if#he offending driver fails to pay the fine. <br /> As a result, the City's Red Ligh# Camera Enforcement Program had <br /> �efi�its in its first two years of exi�tence �fiscai �ParG 2Q08 and 2�09), ln <br /> fiscal year 2010 #he program will experience a surplus. Taking into <br /> account the Cifiy's costs to operate and adminis#er the program, the <br /> average ne� revenue realized by the Cifiy over the current lifetime of the <br /> photo enforcement program is approximately $1,666 per monfh. <br /> �'inding #5 <br /> The data as reparfed indicated that in al�fhe jurisdictions above, the revenue <br /> earned from citations exceec�ed drrecf costs such as the vendor's fee and <br /> employee cos�s. �Recently, the C�ty of San Carlos extended the yellow ligh�time <br /> to comply with state sfandards and found that the number of cifations fe11 <br /> dramatically. As a resutt the revenue from red�ight citafions could no longer <br /> cover the associated costs.} <br /> Response <br /> The City disagrees pattia((y wifh the finding. The revenue is pofential <br /> revenue. The C�ty has h�d significanfi difficulty abtaining i�s po�tion of the <br /> fines from San Mateo County, and, as the Grand Jury explains, "the <br /> firansmittal of the funds from �he county to the cities actually occurs some <br /> months later. In addit"son citation fines may be reduced by fihe traffic court if <br /> appealed." in addition, some fines may never be collected if the offending <br /> dri�er fails to pay�he fine. <br /> FlRd;�y #s <br /> Based on interviews and responses to survey questions, the repor�ing of accident <br /> statist�cs is nof being used as a measure of fhe etfectiveness of red light <br /> cameras. The pr�mary emphasis appears to be on fhe number of c�ta�ions issued. <br /> Based on the data provided by fhe cifies, �here was no overall trend indicafing a <br /> noticeable change in aceident rates before and after installat�on of red ligh� <br /> cameras. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.