Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Stephen Knight, representing Save the Bay and those in opposition to the Cargill plan, <br />finds the plan inappropriate for Redwood City and the Bay Area. He said people can drive <br />out to certain areas to see the saltponds and that more information can be accessed at <br />www.dontoavemvbav.ora/. <br /> <br />Cynthia Denny, representing the Sierra Club California Executive Committee and a <br />delegate to the California-Nevada Regional Conservation Committee (CNRCC) along with <br />two others held up pictures, commenting that the Sierra Club had a unanimous vote in <br />favor of the entire restoration of the saltponds in February 2010. She said she is <br />representing 149,584 individuals and held up a banner with information. She spoke about <br />this land as a national treasure, as an estuary, and is in favor of having the land returned <br />to the South Bay restoration project for full restoration. <br /> <br />William Nack, representing the San Mateo County Building Trades Council with 14,000 <br />members, expressed thanks for the outline of the process. He asked Council to approve <br />the amendment for professional agreement, to continue the EIR and CEQA (California <br />Environmental Quality Act) processes according to the California statute. <br /> <br />Gail Sredanovic shared concerns that some speakers referred to outsiders and opined <br />that the city is intertwined with others, also that all taxpayers have a fiduciary interest in <br />any enormous outlay, such as for any rescue and rebuilding efforts in the event of floods <br />or earthquakes. She also had questions about zoning, definition of waterways, and the <br />CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) process for evaluation of achieving goals. <br /> <br />Julie Abraham, a Redwood City resident, expressed her opinion that everyone's <br />perspective has merit. She shared concerns about one Council Member in regards to <br />state law, as well as other Council Members, and the continuing need for transparency, <br />responsibility, and impartial representation. <br /> <br />Mayor Ira clarified that the Chamber voted to endorse the study of a project but not the <br />project itself. <br /> <br />Nancy Arbuckle, Conservation Chair of the Sequoia Audubon Society - San Mateo County <br />representing 1,600 active members, spoke in opposition to the proposed development. <br />She spoke about the importance of habitat environment, endangered species, and had <br />questions about the EIR process. <br /> <br />John Bruno, from DMB Saltworks, fully supports the city-led process with a full review of <br />the 50-50 balanced plan so that all questions may be answered, and the final decision can <br />be made. He made mention of the 10,000 residents of Redwood City who helped shape <br />this plan with a balanced mixture that includes affordable housing and multiple uses. <br /> <br />Gwenythe J. Scoue, resident of Redwood City and representing the Friends of Redwood <br />City, had questions that she would like answered by city staff or the consultant and made <br />available on the website so that the community can see them (and she referred to an <br />email by Gail Rabbe). She expressed concerns about process, the scoping sessions, and <br />the project's description, objectives, and analysis. <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />August 23, 2010 <br />PAGE 7 <br />