AgdaPkt 2010-10-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.A Attachrr�e*IRc 34 the City Council finds that Mitigation Measures 4.4-5a and 4.4-5b will reduce impacts to active bat roosts and special status species bats because project proponents will be required to consult with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) to avoid impacts to active bat roosts, and if avoidance is not feasible, project proponents will be required to implement mitigation measures to preserve, enhance, and/or restore active bat roosts and habitat in the vicinity of the project area according to CDFG standards. Impact 4.4-6: Development allowed by the New General Plan could result in the potential spread of invasive weeds in the hillsides, creekside and waterfront areas. a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed on page 4.4-38 of the DEIR. b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: FEIR Mitigation Measure 4.4-6a(p. 4.4-38 of the DEIR). FEIR Mitigation Measure 4.4-6b(p. 4.4-38 of the DEIR). c) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City,the City Council finds that Mitigation Measures 4.4-6a and 4.4-6b, together with implementation of General Plan Policy NR-8.3, would reduce the impacts from II/ the potential spreading of invasive weeds to a less-than-significant level because the policy would require replacement and control of invasive weeds and restoration of native species in sensitive areas, and the mitigation measure would require invasive weeds to be identified and mapped prior to consideration of new development projects, and require development sites to be monitored to detect the establishment of new populations of invasive weeds after construction. 411 ATTY/RESO/RESO.2055/ATTACHMENT1.A 20 10/6/10