Laserfiche WebLink
7.A <br /> Page 67 <br /> Alternative 3 Impacts Relative to Project: <br /> Less Impact Greater Impact <br /> Aesthetics (Waterfront shadows) Air Quality(Clean Air Plan) <br /> • <br /> Biological Resources Noise (future noise levels) <br /> Hydro/Water Quality (groundwater Population/Housing <br /> recharge) <br /> Noise (Groundborne vibration) Recreation <br /> Transportation <br /> Energy <br /> • <br /> Alternatives: <br /> • Environmentally Superior Alternative" <br /> That which does best at lessening significant effects while achieving most project <br /> objective <br /> + Alternative 2 identified as environmentally superior alternative; lesser impacts <br /> than Proposed General Plan <br /> • Air Quality <br /> • Noise <br /> • Population/Housing <br /> • Public Services <br /> • Recreation <br /> • Utilities <br /> • Energy <br /> Final EIR: <br /> • Contents <br /> • Introduction <br /> • Responses to Comments <br /> • Revisions & Errata to Draft EIR <br /> • Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program <br /> • Received 86 Comment Letters within & shortly after comment period: <br /> • 5 State Agencies <br /> • 3 Regional Agencies <br /> • 11 Organizations <br /> • 67 Individuals <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />