Laserfiche WebLink
7.r•:ge I of 2 <br /> Page 74 <br /> ATTACHMENT y <br /> PLG-Tom Passanisi <br /> From: Matt Leddy [mtleddy @sbcglobal.net] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:54 AM <br /> To: PLG-Tom Passanisi <br /> Cc: Daniel Ponti; PLG-Jill Ekas <br /> Subject: A Few More NGP Questions <br /> Hi Tom: <br /> I'm sure you are looking forward to wrapping up the New General Plan and the end <br /> is finally in sight! I hope you won't mind if I ask a few more questions regarding the <br /> streetcar and the flooding problem in Friendly Acres/East Bayshore. <br /> First, the streetcar. I really appreciated the information Jill provided at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting in response to Dan Ponti's question. I found the language on <br /> page BE -113 in the "Circulation" section that explains why the various streetcar <br /> corridors were selected. As Jill pointed out, it is clearly stated that the General Plan <br /> includes the Seaport Corridor specifically to connect the ferry and employment <br /> centers to Downtown and the Caltrain station. <br /> My concern is that Master Response #1: Streetcar System in the FEIR actually <br /> documents very thoroughly that the City considers the streetcar line to be growth- <br /> inducing and that the General Plan includes the streetcar as a catalyst for growth: <br /> "The inclusion of the streetcar system is, thus, believed to encourage and facilitate <br /> the level of growth anticipated along key corridors'. <br /> "In this sense, the inclusion of the conceptual streetcar network is intended to <br /> encourage redevelopment and investment in the areas the streetcar network would <br /> serve when constructed". <br /> The streetcar system is being proposed "...as a catalyst for higher density mixed- <br /> use development along its alignment". <br /> Although the City's stated intent for the Seaport Corridor is connecting existing job <br /> centers to transit, the growth-inducing impacts of installing a new streetcar line <br /> directly adjacent to a 1436 acre site for which the City has accepted a mixed-use <br /> development application cannot be ignored in the environmental analysis for the <br /> new General Plan. The reality is that the streetcar line would facilitate mixed-use <br /> development at that site just like the City anticipates occurring along the other <br /> streetcar corridors. <br /> Since the City knows the streetcar is a catalyst for growth, is there a reason the EIR <br /> 9/30/2010 <br />