My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-10-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-10-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2015 1:07:15 PM
Creation date
10/7/2010 3:42:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/11/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A <br /> 9/30/2010 9:36 AM rage 76 <br /> A <br /> PLG-Tom Passanisi <br /> ATTACHMENT <br /> From: Janet Borgens[janetborgens @comcast.net} <br /> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 6:28 PM <br /> To: PLG-Tom Passanisi <br /> Subject: Fw: GP Question from Mr. Ponti.. <br /> Hi Tom. . here is the correspondence from Mr . Ponti . . sorry it is <br /> so late in coming . . <br /> Original Message - - --- <br /> From: "Daniel Ponti" <ponti @astound.net> <br /> To: "Janet Borgens" <JanetBorgens @comcast .net> <br /> Sent : Monday, September 06 , 2010 2.: 11 PM <br /> Subject : GP Question <br /> > Hello .Ms . Borgens - <br /> > I have some observations and questions on the General Plan <br /> that I ' d like <br /> > to get your take on. If you have the same questions , perhaps <br /> you can 411 <br /> > bring this up at the PC Hearing, and of course, if you want to <br /> give me a <br /> > quick call to explain or if you need more clarification from <br /> me, you can <br /> > reach me at the numbers below. <br /> > First off , I don' t want to throw a wrench in the works for the <br /> General <br /> > Plan - overall I think it ' s a good document . However, there <br /> are a couple <br /> > of things that strike me as problematic and should be fixed <br /> (or at least <br /> > better explained to me) . <br /> > The first issue centers on Save the Bay' s comments (Comment <br /> 15 . 10 and <br /> > 15 . 11) that the DEIR may be guilty of segmenting its analysis <br /> of the GP <br /> > in reference to the proposed Seaport Blvd. streetcar line by <br /> "studying <br /> 411 <br /> > expansion of a mass transit system to a part of the City <br /> which is <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.