Laserfiche WebLink
7.A <br /> Page 82 <br /> ATTACHMENT 6 a <br /> I7l: i'1R & PEERS <br /> TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: September 27,2010 <br /> To: Tom Passanisi, City of Redwood City <br /> From: Sam Tabibnia <br /> Subject: New General Plan Final EiR—Response to Caltrans Comments <br /> SJ07--985 <br /> City of Redwood City received comments from Caltrans on the published Final EIR for the New <br /> General Plan dated September 7, 2010 (attached to this memorandum). While formal responses <br /> are not required, as the transportation consultants on the New General Plan project, we have the <br /> following thoughts on the comments: <br /> Comment 4.2 — The methodology and assumptions used to develop future traffic volume <br /> forecasts are described on pages 4.14-28 and 29 of the Draft EIR. The small decrease in <br /> volumes on some street segments is consistent with historic traffic volume trends. As shown on <br /> Figure 11 on page 52 of the Redwood City General Plan Transportation and Circulation Technical <br /> Report, based on historical traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities, traffic volumes have fluctuated <br /> over the last 25 years. Despite the continuous population growth in the City and surrounding <br /> communities, traffic volumes have decreased on some street segments. The decrease of less <br /> than ten percent in traffic volumes on most of the streets mentioned in the comment are <br /> consistent with previous trends and within typical daily fluctuations in observed traffic volumes. <br /> Al!street segments mentioned in the comment currently operate at acceptable conditions and are <br /> expected to continue to operate at acceptable conditions in the future. <br /> Comments 4.3 and 4.5 — The Draft EIR identifies a number of impacts as significant and <br /> unavoidable. These impacts are typically mitigated by widening streets and providing additional <br /> capacity. These mitigations would require additional right-of-way which is generally not available <br /> because they are occupied by existing developments. in addition, potential roadway widening <br /> may conflict with the following New General Plan's Guiding Principles: <br /> • "Work to develop attractive and convenient transportation alternatives, including <br /> transportation hub and ferry system." <br /> • "Design for pedestrian and bicycle friendly streets and public spaces." <br /> • "Plan for sustainable open space, water, energy, and air quality within our finite <br /> resources." <br /> Comments 4.4 and 4.5—Comment noted. As stated in Program BE-75, City of Redwood City is <br /> committed to working with local, regional, state, and federal agencies. As stated in the comment, <br /> the City in partnership with Caltrans, may consider the potential widening of SR 84 between <br /> Middlefield Road and Broadway. <br /> Please contact us with questions or comments. <br /> 100 Pringle Avenue,Suite 600 Walnut Creek,CA 94596 (925)930-7100 Fax(925)933-7090 <br /> www.fehrandpeers.com <br />