Laserfiche WebLink
9 f -2 <br />LEAGUE TO PARTICIPATE IN NORTHERN <br />CALIFORNIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT <br />LEADERSHIP PANEL ON STATE BUDGET <br />CHALLENGES <br />League Legislative Representative Jean <br />Korinke will participate in a March 7, 2003 panel <br />discussion, entitled "Leading the Way through State <br />Budget Challenges ". <br />Sponsored by the Northern California Local <br />Government's Leadership Institute, the conference <br />will actually include two panels, beginning at 9:30 <br />am. <br />The first features representatives from the <br />Legislative Analyst's Office, Speaker Herb <br />Wesson's Office and the Senate Republican Fiscal <br />Office, and focuses on the state budget problem <br />from an insider's perspective. <br />In the afternoon panel, Steve Kell, Legislative <br />Director for the California State Association of <br />Counties, and Ralph Heim, representing the Califor- <br />nia Special Districts Association, will join Jean <br />Korinke. They will discuss the potential problems <br />facing each other's organizations and discuss <br />mutually supportable solutions to protect the <br />interests of local government as legislative delib- <br />erations proceed. The three associations are the <br />founding members of the LOCAL coalition (Leave <br />Our Community Assets Local). <br />For more details on the Conference, go to <br />hftp: / /rce.csuchiro.edu /leader. <br />. ........................... <br />GET GRANTS! <br />The Governor's Office of Planning and Re- <br />search has created an extensive new database <br />that identifies grant sources within California <br />• agenciesthrough a single search. The getgrantsl <br />site allows you to search for grants even if you <br />• don't know the name of the department administer- <br />; ing the grant. The database contains a complete <br />• list of grant programs, with contact name and <br />numbers, as well as Web addresses for applica- <br />tions. For more information, go to gstgrants! at: <br />http://www.iia.ca.aov/GetGrants/aeturants.shtmi <br />............................... <br />SUPREME COURT flrotn page 1......... <br />Not surprisingly, the owners of the land argued that the <br />mere designation of a subdivision on a map prior to 1893 <br />should be enough for the parcels to be recognized. In this <br />case, the subdividing lines were first drawn in 1865 and <br />reprinted on an atlas in 1877. However, as was pointed out <br />in a League - approved friend of the court brief, such a result <br />would undermine one of the fundamental purposes of the <br />Act: to encourage orderly community development, <br />coordinate planning with the community pattern established <br />by local authorities, and assure proper improvements are <br />made, so that the area does not become an undue burden on <br />the taxpayer. <br />Fortunately, the California Supreme Court agreed <br />unanimously. The Court found that the map at issue did not <br />create legally cognizable parcels in 1865. The court found <br />further that even though the grandfather provisions of the <br />Map Act were designed to protect those who detrimentally <br />relied on prior subdivision laws, they evince no intent to <br />imbue antiquated maps with a legal significance that did not <br />exist in their own time. Such a result would not consistent <br />with the Map Act's underlying purposes to facilitate local <br />regulation of the design and improvement of subdivisions so <br />as to encourage orderly community development. <br />While the opinion does not solve all the problems <br />associated with antiquated lots, it goes a long way toward <br />confirming the important role that local agencies play in <br />approving subdivisions. In language that we be useful in <br />other situations, the court stated: <br />"If we were to adopt plaintiffs' position and hold that <br />local agencies must issue a certificate of compliance for any <br />parcel depicted on an accurate, antiquated subdivision map, <br />we would, in effect, be permitting the sale, lease, and <br />financing ofparcels: (1) without regard to regulations that <br />would otherwise require consistency with applicable general <br />and specific plans and require consideration of potential <br />environmental and public health consequences; (2) without <br />consideration of dedications and impact mitigation fees that <br />would otherwise be authorized by the Act; and (3) without <br />affording notice and an opportunity to be heard to interested <br />persons and landowners likely to suffer a substantial or <br />significant deprivation of their property rights (Code <br />citations omitted). <br />The cities joining the League authorized brief in this <br />case were fortunate to have one of the true authorities in <br />California land use law (and former city attorney of Walnut <br />Creek), Dan Curtin of the Bingham McCuthen firm, author <br />the brief on their behalf. The League is grateful for the <br />contribution that Mr. Curtin made to the successful outcome <br />in this case. <br />PAGE 2 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />