My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:44:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2003 5:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
x,63 <br />REDWOOD CITY WATER SUPPLY UPDATE <br />Attachment #1 <br />- CHART ONE <br />REDWOOD CITY WATER USE FORECAST WITH GROWTH INCLUDED IN BASE FORECAST <br />The chart below shows the city's "base forecast" from the Redwood City Urban Water Management Plan, <br />amended Julyl5, 2002 to include the Redwood City Water Use Forecast prepared by John Whitcomb PhD, <br />and accepted by the City Council on July 1, 2002. The base forecast in Chart One includes projected growth <br />information provided by the Community Development Services Department: <br />• By 2010 <br />0 1,390 acre -feet of demand for all new customers / growth <br />o Or the equivalent of 4,220 new housing units (could be a mix of commercial, housing <br />and /or public facilities) <br />• By 2020 <br />0 2,330 acre -feet of demand for all new customers / growth (cumulative) <br />o Or the equivalent of 7,115 new housing units (could be a mix of commercial, housing <br />and /or public facilities) <br />• All known large proposed development projects which are in various stages of review <br />• "Moderate" level of various small infill developments <br />• "Intensification of use" growth factor for existing commercial properties <br />The potential affects of two different levels of water conservation are shown — and the city's resulting gap in <br />water supply. If 2,000 acre -feet of new water supply in the form of recycled water is introduced, the chart <br />demonstrates that it is possible for Redwood City to bring total demand on Hatch Hetchy back to contractual <br />tpply assurance by 2010. However, as the "SFPUC Max Supply 10% Risk" line illustrates, 10% of the time <br />�dwood City is subject to less supply from the regional system due to droughts and /or shortages. This line <br />and its supply reliability implications should be regarded as a planning tool is addressing the question: How <br />much water reliability does Redwood City want to buy, and at what price ?" <br />16,000 <br />15,000- <br />R.. Fnrncact <br />`n <br />Water Supply Assurance 12,243 <br />with Active & Passive Conservation <br />13,000 - <br />Y <br />• <br />� <br />1` <br />c ...... <br />12.000- <br />.... ... .... .. �':..� <br />........... ,.\...... - -- ------ <br />.. <br />• <br />LL <br />• <br />� <br />with Conservation & Ragding <br />11,000 - <br />10,000 w <br />.. <br />i <br />SFPUC Max Supply 10% Risk <br />9 000 <br />Historic <br />Projected <br />..- <br />8,000 <br />1990 <br />2000 2010 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.