My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:44:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2003 5:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e -i <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br />March 10, 2003 <br />Subject <br />Guidelines for FY 03104 General Fund Budget Cuts <br />Recommendation <br />It is recommended that the City Council endorse the policy delineated in scenario "B" in this <br />report, as a way of dealing with our deficit for fiscal year 03/04. <br />Background - (Our Problem) <br />Redwood City has projected deficits for the next four years caused primarily by the <br />downturn of the economy and i ^creased retirement system contributions. <br />Redwood City needs to bring expenditures and revenues into balance. We must focus all <br />of our energies in reducing expenditures and when possible increasing revenues. <br />Our reserves are not a solution to this problem; rather they represent a strategy to give us <br />time to bring expenditures and revenues into balance. <br />In a nut shell, revenues are projected to expand 16% from FY 02/03 to FY 05/06, while <br />expenditures are projected to increase 28% during the same period of time (these figures <br />include 3 % @50 retirement for Fire, but do not include 3 % @50 retirement for Police; nor do <br />they include any additional takeaways by the State). <br />Why are expenditures increasing at a higher rate than revenues? The economic downturn <br />has significantly limited our revenues. Expenditure increases are being driven by labor <br />agreements that have future healthy wage increases which were negotiated several years <br />ago. Expenditures are also increasing because of PERS for two reasons. First, our PERS <br />rate is increasing significantly because of the drop in the stock market. Secondly, we have <br />added the 3 % @50 retirement plan for Fire. Expenditures are also increasing due to <br />significant jumps in health benefits and workers' compensation. <br />The diverging lines of expenditures and revenues need to be brought together. We should <br />use our "reserves" in a strategic way to give us time to accomplish this. Based on our five <br />year projections from the budget, the following revenues and expenditures are relevant <br />(see below). To these numbers we have added the 3 % @50 retirement plan for Police (this <br />is the present City position offered in negotiations) and we have estimated a one million <br />dollar a year loss to the State. These figures together give us our projected deficit over the <br />next several years. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.