Laserfiche WebLink
&A-3 <br />SAMPLE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NEARING COMPLETION <br />The League PG &E Franchise Task Force and <br />legal consultant Michael Woods are in the final stages <br />of reviewing and approving the final draft of the <br />sample franchise ordinance for use by cities in the <br />PG &E transmission territories. Responding to a <br />request by city managers, this Task Force was <br />organized last summer to assist cities in responding to <br />PG &E's applicatioq for franchises for new companies <br />proposed under their bankruptcy Plan of Reorganiza- <br />tion. Since most franchise ordinances are based on <br />standard language dating back to the early 1900s, <br />the task force spent a great deal of time identifying <br />issues and concerns that were not evident 70 or more <br />years ago. The sample ordinance has been de- <br />signed as a framework for future city negotiations with <br />PG &E on behalf of its new transmission subsidiaries <br />in the event the federal bankruptcy court approves <br />the company's plan of reorganization. Neither it nor <br />the work of the League's task force in any way <br />expresses support for any specific outcome by the <br />federal bankruptcy court. <br />Background <br />A League task force was initially formed when <br />PG &E filed for bankruptcy in April 2001 to protect city <br />and community interests from the potential impact of <br />the bankruptcy on service delivery issues and eco- <br />nomic repercussions. Realizing that bankruptcy <br />litigation is a specialized area, several cities with <br />specific concerns joined forces to hire legal services <br />to keep them informed on the bankruptcy process. <br />General city activity diminished until early June <br />2002 when cities throughout the PG &E territory were <br />asked to schedule applications for franchise ordi- <br />nances for new transmission companies on council <br />agendas. City officials were overwhelmed by these <br />PG &E requests, and they promptly turned to the <br />League to forth a task force to study the franchise <br />request and mobilize an appropriate response. <br />In early July 2002 a task force of city managers, <br />city attorneys, finance officers and public works <br />officers met to discuss issues and concerns and <br />develop a list of questions to submit to PG &E regard- <br />ing the franchise application. In early September, the <br />task force met with PG &E officials to discuss ques- <br />tions raised by city officials and to obtain a clearer <br />understanding of the need for the new franchises. <br />Following the September meeting, the task force <br />resolved that progress could only be accomplished if <br />a legal consultant familiar with franchise issues was <br />engaged. They also agreed to form a smaller work- <br />ing group representing a cross section of functional <br />expertise and types of cities. In late September, <br />Michael Woods was retained by the League as legal <br />consultant to assist cities in understanding their rights <br />and privileges under public utility franchise law and to <br />represent cities in talks with PG &E on the terms of a <br />sample franchise ordinance. Since that date Woods <br />has acted as the League's representative in all <br />discussions with PG &E on the sample franchise issue. <br />Over the last several months the discussions with <br />PG &E ebbed and flowed, with both parties encounter- <br />ing difficulties with the others' requests at various <br />times. The objective has been to reach agreement <br />on as many issues as possible, and considerable <br />progress has been made toward that end. Woods <br />has coordinated the League's effort with a similar one <br />by a group of county counsels. The working group <br />and PG &E are expected to independently review a <br />final draft in the first few weeks of March. A sample <br />ordinance should be distributed to cities shortly <br />thereafter. <br />Summary <br />The purpose of the League's efforts to develop a <br />sample franchise ordinance is to provide cities with a <br />document that reflects their rights and privileges <br />under state franchise laws, pointing out distinctions <br />between general law and charter cities where appro- <br />priate. The sample ordinance is designed to provide <br />cities with a framework they can use in considering <br />the adoption of future franchises that adequately <br />protect city interests and unique needs. Since most <br />franchise ordinances are based on terms and condi- <br />tions negotiated in the 1930s and earlier, the sample <br />ordinance is carefully constructed to consider current <br />and future technological, environmental and eco- <br />nomic conditions. At no time has the League ex- <br />pressed support for the PG &E reorganization plan <br />submitted to the bankruptcy court. This effort has <br />been undertaken solely to help cities be prepared in <br />the event the court approves the plan in the future. <br />The sample ordinance also will prove beneficial in city <br />negotiations with other franchise applicants in the <br />future across the state. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 3 <br />