My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 12:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/21/2010 6:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/25/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1 F ' <br /> Page 20 <br /> Grand Jury Response <br /> Page 3 ' <br /> community regarding on-line sexual predators, most departments lack the resources <br /> or personnel to proactively pursue on-line predators. <br /> Sexual Offender Registration <br /> 9. County funding available to monitor sexual offenders is declining. <br /> Response: Respondent agrees with the finding. Despite the lack of funding, the <br /> Redwood City Police Department continues to monitor sex registrants through home <br /> checks and visits. <br /> 2. While the number of Megan's Law registrants who have been convic�ed of sexual <br /> abuse and assault against children grew from 2004-2009, the number of Megan's <br /> Law registration violations prosecuted by fhe DA stayed about constant durrng <br /> this period. <br /> Response: Respondent is unable to respond to this finding. fs unclear whether the <br /> grand jury is stating that individuals have reoffended post registration, or whether the <br /> finding is that the number of registrants has accumulated over the years. <br /> Regardless of the grand jury's contention, there do not appear to be statistics in the <br /> report which support either of these findings. <br /> If the grand jury has concluded that the number of sex registrants is increasing <br /> because the number of convicted sex offenders is increasing cumulatively, this <br /> conclusion may not be accurate. In 2006, the law changed in California regarding <br /> the necessity for certain types of sex offenders to register per section 290 of #he <br /> California Penal Code. [n the case of People v. Hofscheier (20�6) 37 Cal.4 1185, <br /> the California Supreme Court ruled that persons convicted of certain "statutory" sex <br /> offenses cannot be mandated to register as sex offenders. Therefore, even if the <br /> number of persons convicted of sex offenses against children has �emained steady <br /> over the past several years, the number of registered sex offenders would not have <br /> paralleled that trend. <br /> 3. Sex offender reg�strants pursuant fo Secfion 290 of the California Penal Coc�e are <br /> required to regisfer at the San Mateo County SherifPs 4�ce. The Sheriff's O�ce <br /> is only open for sex offender regisfra�ion on Tuesdays and Thursdays between <br /> the hours of 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM. By contrast, the Santa Clara County <br /> SherifPs Office is open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and 52 weeks a year <br /> for sex offenders to register. <br /> Response: This finding was directed towards the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.